Hi,
On 11/28/11 03:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Thing is, it doesn't help you if shop=bakery is rendered, when you are
looking for bread and find a pastry, while it wouldn't help you
neither if you looked for pastry and were led to a bakery, so
basically to make this subtagging work you will
2011/11/28 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
On 11/28/11 03:21, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Thing is, it doesn't help you if shop=bakery is rendered, when you are
looking for bread and find a pastry, while it wouldn't help you
neither if you looked for pastry and were led to a bakery, so
I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these
according to taginfo)
There is some recommendations for similar features
1.
amenity=cafe
cuisine=cake
and
2.
shop=confectionery
I interpret the first as a place to sit and the second seems to be
more suitable for candy and/or
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com writes:
I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these
according to taginfo)
There is some recommendations for similar features
1.
amenity=cafe
cuisine=cake
and
2.
shop=confectionery
I interpret the first as a place to
On 11/27/2011 11:19 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I am not aware of any
that sell cake only, and not other kinds of dessert.
http://www.chocomoosebakery.com/ is probably very close: cake plus one
or two additional items.
Instead of shop=pastry, I would say shop=bakery bakery=pastry, because
then
Wouldn't it make more sense to have shop=bakery
bread=yes (the default)
pastry=yes (when they have pätisserie/banketgebak)
chocolates=yes (if they have fine chocolate sweets)
or something of the kind. I think this is more consistent with other
schemes.
We also make a difference between 'warme
2011/11/27 Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com:
Instead of shop=pastry, I would say shop=bakery bakery=pastry, because
then the bakery rules work, for data consumers that don't know/care
about pastry. And, in the grand ontology we are avoiding building, a
pastry shop is generally a kind of bakery.
