Le 15.11.22 à 14:36, Brian M. Sperlongano a écrit :
Sarah Hoffman has previously pointed out some structural issues with the
use of historic as a top-level key sometimes and an ancillary key other
times:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2022-November/066294.html
On Tue, Nov 15, 2022 at 6:22 AM Włodzimierz Bartczak <
wlodzimierz.bartc...@openstreetmap.pl> wrote:
> That's right it's an oversight. I was a bit hasty. First of all, I wanted
> to start a discussion. It would be worthwhile to sort out the use of this
> key. Everyone is complaining about this
It has come to my attention that the "historic" proposal has apparently
been re-opened for a vote without even a courtesy message to the tagging
mailing list. Thank you to user Mnalis to noticing this and alerting
several community members that have previously commented on the proposal.
