On 10/07/19 00:42, Andy Townsend wrote:
On 09/07/2019 15:27, Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Martin Koppenhoefer
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 15:57, Paul Allen mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Where an
discussion, strategy and related tools
Objet : Re: [Tagging] Removing an ATM
9 lip 2019, 16:27 od pla16...@gmail.com:
Not really. They don't get rendered (on standard carto). So they don't help
anyone orient
themselves.
OSM Carto is not a sole map style.
As with disused: and abandoned:, the only re
9 lip 2019, 16:27 od pla16...@gmail.com:
> Not really. They don't get rendered (on standard carto). So they don't help
> anyone orient
> themselves.
>
OSM Carto is not a sole map style.
> As with disused: and abandoned:, the only real purpose is to prevent mappers
> re-instating the
>
On 09/07/2019 14:04, MARLIN LUKE wrote:
Hi,
I've read in the wiki (and on this list) that it's best to avoid loosing
history.
This refers to the edit history of an object ie How many times it's been
amended, by whom, & what got changed.
I have an ATM mapped in a street which does not
9 lip 2019, 17:00 od pla16...@gmail.com:
> I prefer landuse=quarry + disused=yes to disused:landuse=quarry. A working
> quarry observed
> on a Sunday may be difficult to distinguish from a disused quarry. Tagging
> for the renderer
> or choosing between valid alternative tagging schemes? I
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 17:00, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> on UK maps in general to render, or at least label, disused quarries.
> Because they're holes in
> the ground, can present hazards, and may be of use for navigation. So in
> this particular case
> I prefer landuse=quarry
On 09.07.19 15:04, MARLIN LUKE wrote:
> I have an ATM mapped in a street which does not exist anymore
> (apparently since 2014).
Historic features should not be mapped in OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Good_practice#Don.27t_map_historic_events_and_historic_features
Therefore, an
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 15:43, Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 09/07/2019 15:27, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Not really. They don't get rendered (on standard carto).
>
> ... but depending on the feature, they may do elsewhere.
>
Indeed. That's why I added the proviso about standard carto.
OpenRailwayMap
On 09/07/2019 15:27, Paul Allen wrote:
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Martin Koppenhoefer
mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com>> wrote:
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 15:57, Paul Allen mailto:pla16...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Where an object is no longer physically present, such
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 15:10, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 9. Jul 2019, at 15:57, Paul Allen wrote:
> >
> > Where an object is no longer physically present, such as a telephone
> booth that has
> > been removed, then removed:amenity=telephone.
>
> while disused and
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 15:57, Paul Allen wrote:
>
> Where an object is no longer physically present, such as a telephone booth
> that has
> been removed, then removed:amenity=telephone.
while disused and abandoned features make sense and can be observed, may help
for
On Tue, 9 Jul 2019 at 14:11, marc marc wrote:
>
> some prefix all tag with was: or similar
> it allows the next contributor who sees it in a photo to avoid making
> the mistake of adding the object you deleted
>
I've used was for things that are still there but have changed their
functionality.
sent from a phone
> On 9. Jul 2019, at 15:04, MARLIN LUKE wrote:
>
> Should I:
> -Remove the tag and keep a blank point? (triggers a message on iD, I'm not
> even sure I can save the changes)
> -Remove the point altogether and lose the history?
> -Another solution?
if the node is not used
Le 09.07.19 à 15:04, MARLIN LUKE a écrit :
> I've read in the wiki (and on this list) that it's best to avoid loosing
> history.
the usecase is when a poi change his name : don't delete+create an new
the poi, but update the name
> -Remove the tag and keep a blank point?
no.
> -Remove the
Hi,
I've read in the wiki (and on this list) that it's best to avoid loosing
history.
I have an ATM mapped in a street which does not exist anymore (apparently since
2014).
Should I:
-Remove the tag and keep a blank point? (triggers a message on iD, I'm not even
sure I can save the changes)
15 matches
Mail list logo
