Has this discussion died now and awaits re-revival in another two,
three years? ;-)
Martin
2012/6/15 Eckhart Wörner ewoer...@kde.org:
Hi everybody,
let me try to summarize some parts of the discussion up to now. Hopefully
this won't become too biased:
* most people agreed that the syntax
* some people argued that conditions syntax should look similar to
human language, however, other people argued that this would trick
mappers into thinking that human language can be used without paying
attention to syntax, and others pointed out that that a parser that has
to be liberal about
Hi everybody,
let me try to summarize some parts of the discussion up to now. Hopefully this
won't become too biased:
* most people agreed that the syntax of the competing Access Restrictions 1.5
proposal is quite complicated
* some people argued that it is important to separate syntax for
+1 to the summary and especially to:
Am 15.06.2012 um 16:41 schrieb Eckhart Wörner ewoer...@kde.org:
I would also like to ask people not to blindly start new proposals, because
otherwise we'll inevitably end up with hundreds of proposals and no
conclusion at all.
I would even prefer to have
