2010/8/9 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
There exists a proposal:
wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Conditions_for_access_tags
which was made for theses conditions, but it uses a relation and I was in no
need so far to use it.
you don't need relations for this. There is also
On 9 August 2010 05:55, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
That tag seems rather awkward, but it does bring up a good point about
The rest of your email described seasonal conditions that are the same
year in and year out, but for most of Australia there isn't seasonal
conditions in the
Am 09.08.2010 09:52, schrieb John Smith:
On 9 August 2010 05:55, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
That tag seems rather awkward, but it does bring up a good point about
The rest of your email described seasonal conditions that are the same
year in and year out, but for most of
On 2 August 2010 19:39, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
This has nothing to do with weather conditions, but a stupid driver ignoring
signed warnings.
Perhaps not the best example of what Liz was thinking of, however this
is a better example:
On 02/08/2010 10:46, John Smith wrote:
On 2 August 2010 19:39, Dave F.dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
This has nothing to do with weather conditions, but a stupid driver ignoring
signed warnings.
Perhaps not the best example of what Liz was thinking of, however this
is a better example:
On 2 August 2010 20:03, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
Road closed signs are not always put up, but the sign that the road will be
closed by wet weather is there all year round.
I don't think the report mentioned if there was signs saying the road
would be closed during wet weather, but I guess
On 2 August 2010 20:05, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I see - a permanent sign.
I've no idea was this was objected to. Was the discussion on how it was to
be tagged?
I can't remember what happened, and there is nothing really useful on
the discussion page at all.
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:10 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2 August 2010 20:05, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
I see - a permanent sign.
I've no idea was this was objected to. Was the discussion on how it was to
be tagged?
I can't remember what happened, and there
On 3 August 2010 11:28, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 8:10 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't remember what happened, and there is nothing really useful on
the discussion page at all.
Looks like the usual tussle between mapping at some
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote:
If it's the discussion I'm remembering, I think the debate may have
started with the tag 4wd_only, (something like that, may not be
exact). Which had the same issues - people were debating the
questions, while my point of
Before this list existed, the need for a dry_weather_only tag was disputed on
talk.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/08/02/2970371.htm
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
11 matches
Mail list logo
