> 2012/10/30 Colin Smale :
>> There is also the
>> "destination" tag set which covers the ref "as signposted", allowing the
>> ref=* to reflect the actual administrative ID.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
>
> If you mean by "destination tag set" the key destination:ref I'l
2012/10/30 Colin Smale :
> There is also the
> "destination" tag set which covers the ref "as signposted", allowing the
> ref=* to reflect the actual administrative ID.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:destination
If you mean by "destination tag set" the key destination:ref I'll
agree. B
> * Andrew Errington [2012-10-24 14:49 +0900]:
>
> I think it's incredibly relevant whether it's included on the sign. I
> suspect that the vast majority of people who use maps with reference
> numbers on them use those maps for navigation. I think such people would
> primarily be interested in
* Andrew Errington [2012-10-24 14:49 +0900]:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:10 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
> > using something like "ref:unsigned=OH 315C" to mean "this road is part of
> > Ohio state route 315C but the signs don't say so" sounds perfectly sane to
> > me.
>
> It doesn't sound sane to
> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 16:26:11 -0400
> From: nice...@att.net
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link
>
> On 10/23/2012 4:10 PM, Johan C wrote:
> > c) it quite often will be impossible for any (present/future) routing
> >
> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 14:49:57 +0900
> From: erringt...@gmail.com
> To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Tagging] Tag ref on motorway_link
>
> > Richard didn't say he uses that key *because* it's not rendered; he
> > uses it because it makes sens
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 2:10 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
>
> On Oct 24, 2012 12:25 AM, "Andrew Errington" wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Welty
>> wrote:
>> > this is why i don't put New York State Reference Route numbers in the
>> > ref tag, i put them in ref:unsigned whic
On Oct 24, 2012 12:25 AM, "Andrew Errington" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Welty
wrote:
> > this is why i don't put New York State Reference Route numbers in the
> > ref tag, i put them in ref:unsigned which isn't rendered.
>
> Isn't that simply tagging for the renderer? A
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
> On 10/23/12 9:15 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
>>
>> If a motorway link is part of a route (one needs to actually drive on the
>> link to continue on the route) then I put the ref for that route on the
>> link. Otherwise, no ref tag.
>>
> i agr
On 10/23/12 11:52 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
On Oct 23, 2012 9:32 PM, "Richard Welty" wrote:
by convention, ref tags get rendered on the map
I think the main Mapnik rendering does not render ref on highway=*_link,
actually.
in some sense, that's helpful, in another, it's not.
richard
On Oct 23, 2012 9:32 PM, "Richard Welty" wrote:
> by convention, ref tags get rendered on the map
I think the main Mapnik rendering does not render ref on highway=*_link,
actually.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstre
On Oct 23, 2012 8:32 PM, "Richard Welty" wrote:
>
> On 10/23/12 9:15 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
>>
>> If a motorway link is part of a route (one needs to actually drive on the
>> link to continue on the route) then I put the ref for that route on the
>> link. Otherwise, no ref tag.
>>
> i agree.
>
On 10/23/12 9:15 PM, David ``Smith'' wrote:
If a motorway link is part of a route (one needs to actually drive on the
link to continue on the route) then I put the ref for that route on the
link. Otherwise, no ref tag.
i agree.
by convention, ref tags get rendered on the map and users of the m
If a motorway link is part of a route (one needs to actually drive on the
link to continue on the route) then I put the ref for that route on the
link. Otherwise, no ref tag.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.or
On 10/23/2012 4:10 PM, Johan C wrote:
c) it quite often will be impossible for any (present/future) routing
engine to always predict the right exit number based on the
motorway_junction ref. Imagine a more complicated junction. These may use
y-splits where one highway=motorway is split into two h
Well, Andrews suggestion is a bit problematic.
1. in reality, the motorway_links are a official part of the motorway. Just
look at the signs on the side of the motorway_link. Thus, it should be
possible to use ref=A15 for example on a motorway_link.
2. a motorway entry would be quite simple for a
Why make exceptions? Let's keep the rules as simple as possible (but not
simpler). Routes are always relations anyway, to allow ways to be part of
multiple routes.
Legislating that a motorway_link should never have a ref tag, is a rule
which is asking to be broken a million times. I try never to r
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Andrew Errington
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:47:40 Martin Vonwald (imagic) wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > I'm wondering what ref should be used on slip roads/ramps of a motorway
>> > (not the junction no
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Andrew Errington wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:47:40 Martin Vonwald (imagic) wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm wondering what ref should be used on slip roads/ramps of a motorway
> > (not the junction node, but the way tagged with motorway_link). Up to now
> > I've seen
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 14:47:40 Martin Vonwald (imagic) wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm wondering what ref should be used on slip roads/ramps of a motorway
> (not the junction node, but the way tagged with motorway_link). Up to now
> I've seen: * the reference of the junction
> * the reference of the motorway
>
Hi Martin,
First and foremost, tags applied to an object should of course refer to
that object. I normally interpret the "ref" tag on a ROAD as "the
reference ID of that ROAD as designated by the powers-that-be". Motorway
slip roads are (in my experience in UK/NL) administratively speaking an
extr
Hi!
I'm wondering what ref should be used on slip roads/ramps of a motorway (not
the junction node, but the way tagged with motorway_link). Up to now I've seen:
* the reference of the junction
* the reference of the motorway
* the reference of the junction not in the ref tag but in junction:ref
*
22 matches
Mail list logo
