Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread yo paseopor
I would start a "definitive thread" with all the options, all the possibilities, all the points of view, all the information and then, passing all to the wiki with a votting or aproved by list complete proposal. Some people is watching us and in a near future will try to collaboret with us so it

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:22:44 -0700 Tod Fitch wrote: > > It is not clear what we have gained by spitting the original topic > into multiple parts. Nothing... Had I been aware of the other thread I would probably not have started this one ! Oh well... 'git merge' for mailing

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Tod Fitch
> On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:15:41 +0100 > yo paseopor wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer >> wrote: On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:15:41 +0100 yo paseopor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier > > > wrote: > > > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:03:47 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only > > covers the simple case but covers it simply > > >

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-24 Thread Topographe Fou
are not the only data consumer ;) ). What do you think? LeTopographeFou   Message original   De: dieterdre...@gmail.com Envoyé: 23 mars 2017 9:05 PM À: j...@liotier.org Répondre à: tagging@openstreetmap.org Cc: tagging@openstreetmap.org Objet: Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-23 Thread yo paseopor
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only > > covers the simple case but

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-23 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only > covers the simple case but covers it simply while this might work often with stop signs it'll hardly work with maxspeed signs,

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

2017-03-23 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 16:31:47 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2017-03-23 15:47 GMT+01:00 Jean-Marc Liotier : > >> I'm not operating a routing system so maybe someone who is >> might offer his opinion on that point > > in another thread a few days