On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
- Approval does not imply enforcement. I don't know why you'd think
that. Just because we have rules doesn't mean anyone particularly
enforces them.
You can always claim that every one is free to use his own rules. But
* John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com [2012-02-19 14:13 -0600]:
I take it, then, that there are some watercourses tagged as streams, but
named XXX River, and there are some watercourses tagged as rivers, but
named XXX Stream or XXX Creek?
It's what I've done, based on my understanding of the
Hi Chris,
Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2012, 15:53 + schrieb Chris Hill:
I do not agree with the whole basis of this thread.
There are no such things as approved tags, tagging is open and people
are free to use *any* tags they like.
There are no such things as deprecated tags, tagging is
Am Montag, den 20.02.2012, 20:11 + schrieb Chris Hill:
On 19/02/12 23:38, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Chris Hillo...@raggedred.net wrote:
I do not agree with the whole basis of this thread.
There are no such things as approved tags, tagging is open and
On 19/02/12 23:38, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Chris Hillo...@raggedred.net wrote:
I do not agree with the whole basis of this thread.
There are no such things as approved tags, tagging is open and people are
free to use *any* tags they like.
...
Advertise your
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
No. It implies some official status that leads people to remove other tags,
sometimes with mass edits.
IMHO that doesn't follow at all. If people are doing unwanted mass
edits, then we should find a way to discourage them.
Hi all,
the relation type=waterway proposal was written long times ago but never
formally approved:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway
The relation is widely used as you can see in statistics:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway#Tools
It
Am 19. Februar 2012 10:47 schrieb Werner Hoch werner...@gmx.de:
Hi all,
the relation type=waterway proposal was written long times ago but never
formally approved:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Waterway
The relation is widely used as you can see in statistics:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Before we vote, shouldn't we try to clean up the proposal? E.g. there
is this sentence: Hint: If the waterway starts as a stream and
becomes larger, then use the tag of the largest waterway (e.g.
river).
Well,
Am 19. Februar 2012 12:16 schrieb Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, almost all rivers start small and become bigger ;-), but despite
being small, don't they already start as rivers at their spring?
No,
Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2012, 22:16 +1100 schrieb Steve Bennett:
The proposal looks pretty sensible to me. I just wish there was a
meaningful process we could follow. Probably what we really want to do
is deprecate any alternative tagging schemes, and direct people to
this one.
As soon as the
On 19 Feb 2012, at 14:34, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
waterway=riverbank is an alternative way of mapping a waterway=river,
and can coexist with it.
+1, they are actually an additional way of tagging the extent.
I still remain of the opinion that a river starts at its
On 19/02/12 11:56, Werner Hoch wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 19.02.2012, 22:16 +1100 schrieb Steve Bennett:
The proposal looks pretty sensible to me. I just wish there was a
meaningful process we could follow. Probably what we really want to do
is deprecate any alternative tagging schemes, and direct
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
Advertise your ideas and encourage acceptance. Show how well it works any
why it is better but don't use a phoney voting process ignored by the vast
majority as a mandate for action.
Voting is a valuable process.
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Before we vote, shouldn't we try to clean up the proposal? E.g.
there
is this sentence: Hint: If the waterway starts as a stream and
becomes larger, then use the
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Chris Hill o...@raggedred.net wrote:
I do not agree with the whole basis of this thread.
There are no such things as approved tags, tagging is open and people are
free to use *any* tags they like.
...
Advertise your ideas and encourage acceptance. Show how
16 matches
Mail list logo
