Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread ael
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 05:29:07PM +, Philip Barnes wrote: > On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 18:20 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote: > > Yes, I think that would be good. > > Organic would seem a bit specific and imply you can only take waste > there if it is organic, i.e. never use week killer, you only buy

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Thorsten Alge
actually it is not about tagging the kind of waste. I looket up amenity=waste_disposa, it is for big trash bins. What I look for is kind of a small landfill where residents can dump their garden waste. At the moment I think using a small area with landuse=landfill and recycling:green_waste woud

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 18:20 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote: > Yes, I think that would be good. Organic would seem a bit specific and imply you can only take waste there if it is organic, i.e. never use week killer, you only buy organic compost, all food waste is organic. Not many households can

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Thorsten Alge
Yes, I think that would be good. On 2017-03-11 18:16, Kevin Kenny wrote: > On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Thorsten Alge > wrote: > > > Well, to tag the supervision it would be ok. But how shall small places > where residents

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Kevin Kenny
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Thorsten Alge wrote: > > Well, to tag the supervision it would be ok. But how shall small places > where residents are allowed to dump their green waste to rot tagged. is > amenity=recycling with recycling_type=centre correct or is there

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 17:18 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote: > > Dump is the wrong word. In this context it is an American word, > > rather > > than British, but my understanding of it is that it is where > > rubbish is > > dumped rather than recycled. > > > > The normal term is non-recyclable, but

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Thorsten Alge
> Dump is the wrong word. In this context it is an American word, rather > than British, but my understanding of it is that it is where rubbish is > dumped rather than recycled. > > The normal term is non-recyclable, but that does not mean landfill. It > could equally be incinerated. > > If you

Re: [Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Philip Barnes
On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 17:01 +0100, Thorsten Alge wrote: > Hi, > > there are two type of recycling, container and centre. For a landfill > one can tag a closed way with landuse=landfill. But for smaller, > unsupervised dumps (e.g. for green and garden waste) a node tagged > with >

[Tagging] amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump

2017-03-11 Thread Thorsten Alge
Hi, there are two type of recycling, container and centre. For a landfill one can tag a closed way with landuse=landfill. But for smaller, unsupervised dumps (e.g. for green and garden waste) a node tagged with amenity=recycling & recycling_type=dump would be better in my opinion. What do others