Re: [Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

On Tue, 31 Oct 2017 10:44:09 + Adam Snape wrote: > Might access tags for emergency service personnel be a solution for a > non-existant problem? Are there really many places which the emergency > services are explicitly legally prohibited from accessing? There may

Re: [Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

Hi Adam, This thread came into existance after questions to use from people actually working with the emergency services to improve routing for them. There is a real issue to solve. Basically, emergency services can often ignore many laws of traffic, but there are some exceptions. Especially in

Re: [Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

Might access tags for emergency service personnel be a solution for a non-existant problem? Are there really many places which the emergency services are explicitly legally prohibited from accessing? Adam On 31 October 2017 at 09:00, joost schouppe wrote: > Hi

Re: [Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

Hi Mateusz, Of course a single bad link is not enough. I also didn't realize how many objects are already tagged with emergency=yes. I've never liked the way access is implied on all the specific tags, where we write access:bicycle as bicycle. IMHO, it makes the tagging scheme more complicated

Re: [Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

Single bad link on wiki is not a good reason for mass edit worldwide, changing all editors, changing all data consumers, changing habits of all users using this tag, introducing confusing and unusual prefix (it is not like OSM tagging scheme requires more confusing things) and changing all pages

[Tagging] confusing wiki on emergency

Hi, On the access page, there is a described use for emergency=* . However, when you click through, you get to a page to a tag that describes all sorts of amenities related to emergency. Would this be a reason to retag emergency when related to access as the implied tag access:emergency=*, and