Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/8/24 Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net: I would expect the opposite - the elevation of the water surface above sea level. It appears that Google Earth does it this way (e.g. Lake Arrowhead ~ 34.258476, -117.182861). If you look at other maps e.g. here:

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread John Smith
Since water levels, can fluctuate substantially both seasonally and annually, I'm not sure of the benefit of the ele=* tag on bodies of water, nor on contours since this is something you'd use DEM information/files for. *Maybe* I'd use them on glaciers, but only peaks, otherwise you just end up

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread Elena of Valhalla
On 8/23/10, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: How do you use the key ele for water covered areas like lakes? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele I think I would use it to tag the height of the ground (solid) part, and not the water surface, because this is what I would

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread Liz
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Elena of Valhalla wrote: on the way that marks the boundary of lakes etc. I would expect the ele key to tag the average height of the water surface, since that is what is constant on the whole lake I live in a land of drought and flooding rains (apologies to the poet). So

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread Elena of Valhalla
On 8/24/10, Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Elena of Valhalla wrote: on the way that marks the boundary of lakes etc. I would expect the ele key to tag the average height of the water surface, since that is what is constant on the whole lake I live in a land of drought and

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread Liz
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Elena of Valhalla wrote: but is the bottom of such lakes a flat surface with a constant elevation? if it isn't, such a value wouldn't be meaningful as well on some it is eg Lake Cargelligo is almost flat at the bottom - I've seen it empty and others are obviously not

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-24 Thread Simon Ward
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 10:04:09PM +1000, Liz wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010, Elena of Valhalla wrote: but is the bottom of such lakes a flat surface with a constant elevation? if it isn't, such a value wouldn't be meaningful as well on some it is eg Lake Cargelligo is almost flat at the bottom

[Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-23 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
How do you use the key ele for water covered areas like lakes? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele I think I would use it to tag the height of the ground (solid) part, and not the water surface, because this is what I would expect a terrain model would display. On the other hand for

Re: [Tagging] ele-key for lakes / water bodies and glaciers

2010-08-23 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2010-08-23 11:52, =?UTF-8?Q?M=E2=88=A1rtin_Koppenhoefer?= wrote: How do you use the key ele for water covered areas like lakes? http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele I think I would use it to tag the height of the ground (solid) part, and not the water surface, because this is what I