Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Sorry, but bed_and_breakfast is not tagged in the "hundreds and thousands" - it is in fact used less than 700 times worldwide (about 300 in the UK, including 10% of the total in one town alone!). And if you look at the tag history graph you'll see it has never been above 750 at any point.

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Am 15.10.2018 um 16:38 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer mailto:t.pfei...@computer.org>>: On 15.10.2018 10:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 3. amenity=creche and amenity=nursery > For both tags amenity=kindergarten is suggested

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 13:55 Uhr schrieb Lionel Giard < lionel.gi...@gmail.com>: > > For tourism=* tag, for me, it is just a method to not tag each artwork > with "tourism=attraction" i would suppose (as they are probably all an > attraction), while a parliament *could *be a tourism=attraction,

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

15. Oct 2018 12:27 by dieterdre...@gmail.com : >> I am not sure how it changes that we ended with tourism-artwork as a >> standard. >> >> Also, "has nothing at all" is not true. Artworks are quite likely to be a >> tourism attractions. >> >> >> >> > > following

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 14:21 Uhr schrieb Tom Pfeifer < t.pfei...@computer.org>: > On 15.10.2018 10:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 3. amenity=creche and amenity=nursery > > For both tags amenity=kindergarten is suggested as alternative tagging, > which seems clearly wrong > > (kindergarten

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

On 15.10.2018 10:57, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 3. amenity=creche and amenity=nursery For both tags amenity=kindergarten is suggested as alternative tagging, which seems clearly wrong (kindergarten is usually for ages 3-6 while these tags are for ages 0-3). I thought the consensus was here

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

> > I am not sure how it changes that we ended with tourism-artwork as a >> standard. >> >> Also, "has nothing at all" is not true. Artworks are quite likely to be a >> tourism attractions. >> >> > > > following this argument, we would have to tag the national parliaments as > tourism=parliament

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

Am Mo., 15. Okt. 2018 um 12:20 Uhr schrieb Mateusz Konieczny < matkoni...@tutanota.com>: > 15. Oct 2018 10:57 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > 1. amenity=artwork > Yes, tourism=artwork is the established tagging, but it has issues: > artwork has nothing at all to do with tourism > > As I understand

Re: [Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

15. Oct 2018 10:57 by dieterdre...@gmail.com : > 1. amenity=artwork > Yes, tourism=artwork is the established tagging, but it has issues: artwork > has nothing at all to do with tourism > As I understand you - in your opinion it would be preferable to end with

[Tagging] issues with the list of deprecated features

I just ran into this summary page for deprecated features: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features There are a few issues which I would like to discuss: 1. amenity=artwork Yes, tourism=artwork is the established tagging, but it has issues: artwork has nothing at all to do with