If there is an issue with something merged too fast into iD, I guess that the
devs could welcome a revert.
Yves
Le 11 octobre 2018 11:19:33 GMT+02:00, marc marc a
écrit :
>Le 10. 10. 18 à 21:22, yo paseopor a écrit :
>> avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list"
>
>>
Am Do., 11. Okt. 2018 um 11:20 Uhr schrieb marc marc <
marc_marc_...@hotmail.com>:
> the propal was still under discussion, the meaning not yet
> finalized that it was already merged in iD... so what is the point of
> continuing to discuss the problem if the dev is above the community?)
In the
Le 10. 10. 18 à 21:22, yo paseopor a écrit :
> avoid problems with new iD editor as an agreement on tagging list"
> mechanical edit
this is the main problem with the current way of doing things:
a dev has a problem and it turns into a hidden mass edit, poorly
documented compared to community
