Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm currently tinkering with what will be come a proposal to modify
current hydrant tagging.
my thinking is to add
fire_hydrant:water_source={main,pond,stream,standpipe}
and deprecate fire_hydrant:type=pond
no objections except 'standpipe' - see
I also disagree with standpipe, in UK usage a standpipe is an emergency source
of water provided for residents if mains water if off for some reason.
Phil (trigpoint)
--
Sent from my Nokia N9
On 27/02/2014 9:37 Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm currently
On 2/27/14 4:37 AM, Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 26.02.2014 13:23, schrieb Richard Welty:
then the issue is whether we want to modify fire_hydrant:type or
replace it with a different tag altogether, say fire_hydrant:delivery
if we keep type, should we replace pillar with plug or fire_plug or just
Richard,
fire_hydrant:type should remain unchanged, as this is negotiated with local fire
departments here in Austria (as well as Germany). At least this is true for
pillar and underground, those are most common and most important.
Then there are fixed suction points, either from a pond or from
On 2/27/14 2:36 PM, Andreas Labres wrote:
Richard,
fire_hydrant:type should remain unchanged, as this is negotiated with local
fire
departments here in Austria (as well as Germany). At least this is true for
pillar and underground, those are most common and most important.
i now am
Color-coding is likely used by the fire department to signify matters such as
how much water-flow is available. I don't know how standardized these color
codes are, however.
On February 27, 2014 1:36:48 PM CST, Andreas Labres l...@lab.at wrote:
Richard,
fire_hydrant:type should remain
On 2/27/14 2:56 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
Color-coding is likely used by the fire department to signify matters such as
how much water-flow is available. I don't know how standardized these color
codes are, however.
there are standards published by the AWWA (American Water
Works
Am 25.02.2014 17:08, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
for fire_hydrant:type came from?
AFAIK the Germans are guilty again - and I plea myself for not-guilty. ;-)
(see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Fire_Hydrant
and their
On 2/26/14 3:30 AM, Georg Feddern wrote:
Am 25.02.2014 17:08, schrieb Richard Welty:
i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
for fire_hydrant:type came from?
AFAIK the Germans are guilty again - and I plea myself for not-guilty.
;-)
(see
i'm wondering if anyone can speak to where the tagging
for fire_hydrant:type came from?
i'm seeing two issues with it right now.
one is that it conflates two concepts that probably should be
separated, the physical delivery method, e.g.
fire_hydrant:type=pillar
and the water source
I wonder if there might be some regional variation in the US: I've always
thought of them as fire hydrants rather than fire plugs.
Looks like fire plug might be an older term and technology maybe coming out of
England based on the introductory paragraph at
11 matches
Mail list logo
