Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

Thanks. I added it to https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site#Examples 7. Oct 2018 17:23 by marc.ge...@gmail.com : > The relation is >

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

The relation is https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2721886 The historic place link only works if you manually select a base map from the menu. regards m. On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 2:47 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > I found (again) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site >

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

I found (again) https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Site and I am trying to improve it. "multiple cave entrances of a single cave" sounds like a good example of a valid use but

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

My main use for site relation are for historical sites to group the historical elements of the castle or other historical site including the wall, moat, buildings (especially the ones touching each other) and various nodes. An example in the historical commandry of the Hospital order (in Belgium)

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

This relation combines a number of cave entrances the belong to the same system that is apparantly protected: http://gk.historic.place/historische_objekte/translate/en/index-en.html?zoom=16=50.67804=7.22231=BFT=3 On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 5:08 PM Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > 2. Październik 2018

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

This my pet use case for a site relation: https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3161183#map=7/46.532/6.097 I'm not confortable to draw polygons around the ski pistes to then build a landuse=winter_sport multipolygon. Given the wildlife conservation rules in the area, I also doubt I can include

Re: [Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

2. Październik 2018 12:36 od marc_marc_...@hotmail.com : > Le 02. 10. 18 à 11:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > > Can you link this case if that is more complicated? > it's a fictional example. ok not the better one. > > take again the example you cut in the

[Tagging] relation site <> multipolygon

Le 02. 10. 18 à 11:46, Mateusz Konieczny a écrit : > Can you link this case if that is more complicated? it's a fictional example. ok not the better one. take again the example you cut in the initial message: a wind turbin site with a few turbines represented by a few nodes I hope your solution