Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 15:55:58 +0200 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > 2016-07-23 15:21 GMT+02:00 ael : > > > OTOH, some of the deep historic cuttings illustrated earlier don't > > seem to me to fit the description hollow_way, which was perhaps the >

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

2016-07-23 15:21 GMT+02:00 ael : > OTOH, some of the deep historic cuttings illustrated earlier don't > seem to me to fit the description hollow_way, which was perhaps the > point. > yes, there are different kind of historic road tags around, e.g. historic=

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:45:31PM +, Alejandro S. wrote: > Hi, > IMHO they are the same feature but made by different methods (handmade or > erosion), maybe we can use cutting=handmade and cutting=hollow_way > respectively? And let cutting=yes as the general tag. Well, yes when that is

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

Hi, IMHO they are the same feature but made by different methods (handmade or erosion), maybe we can use cutting=handmade and cutting=hollow_way respectively? And let cutting=yes as the general tag. Regards, Alejandro On Sat, Jul 23, 2016, 03:50 Kevin Kenny wrote:

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

The mountains around here have seen several waves of unsuccessful settlement. The soil is just too poor to sustain a substantial human presence. The scars of old abandoned roads have continued to erode. I'd use the proposed feature for abandoned tracks like https://flic.kr/p/oNCZVD where the

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

sent from a phone > Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 22:34, ael ha > scritto: > > Actually, having done a bit more research, I am not sure that anyone > knows whether they were originally "cuttings" designed to offer shelter > from prevailing wind and rain. Or

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 05:07:36PM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 14:18, ael ha > > scritto: > > > > Well, if you do revive it, it needs to take account of places like > > Cornwall in the UK where most of the older lanes and

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

sent from a phone > Il giorno 22 lug 2016, alle ore 14:18, ael ha > scritto: > > Well, if you do revive it, it needs to take account of places like > Cornwall in the UK where most of the older lanes and paths are > "sunken", although I think by design rather than

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:57:21AM +0200, joost schouppe wrote: > Hi, > > There is an abandoned proposal about tagging hollow ways [1]. How does one > go about reviving it? > Well, if you do revive it, it needs to take account of places like Cornwall in the UK where most of the older lanes and

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

I messed up: I thought I checked all the variants mentioned in the article, but I missed the main proposal somehow. As it's used already a couple of 100 times, I'll just adapt the article as you suggest, to reflect the in-use character. 2016-07-21 13:00 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

sent from a phone > Il giorno 21 lug 2016, alle ore 10:31, Tom Pfeifer > ha scritto: > > However, as this is just a value for the historic tag, and it is used 580x > already, you could > check some of these exiting taggings if they follow the same meaning, and >

Re: [Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

I'd say it depends on the depth of the decision process so far. If it was a failed proposal with a voting, I'd start from scratch, avoiding the problems of the previous. There are a number of "2.0" approaches. In the case you cite, the page was last touched by the authors in 2010, and there

[Tagging] reviving an abandoned proposal

Hi, There is an abandoned proposal about tagging hollow ways [1]. How does one go about reviving it? Reviving abandoned proposals in general does not seem to be explained in the wiki [2] (but I'm not the best at reading doc). I would want to adapt the proposal with the input from the discussion.