On 4/03/2015 8:24 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-03-04 2:37 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com:
Using the relation, I've added step area to the Sydney Opera House
.. it is a very wide area ..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4645750
2015-03-04 10:46 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
There also seems to be a contradiction in that the standard steps ways
extend beyond the area and up to the center of the road. I'd suggest to
split them and have them end at the first riser (= the way with the role
lower) and tag the
2015-03-04 2:37 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
Using the relation, I've added step area to the Sydney Opera House .. it
is a very wide area ..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4645750
IMHO you don't need the lateral ways in this case, but they won't harm
anyway.
I suggest you
Using the relation, I've added step area to the Sydney Opera House .. it
is a very wide area ..
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/4645750
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_dWyIdmBCSgM/S4N0sVrvg1I/BuM/Y-b1wCmXbps/s1600-h/DSCN7848.JPG
Are there any examples of a non rectangular large area
On 01.03.2015 23:26, Warin wrote:
I have edited the wiki to better reflect the situation. I have also
changed the order ...
Thank you! :)
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 2/03/2015 2:14 AM, fly wrote:
Am 28.02.2015 um 10:39 schrieb Tobias Knerr:
On 28.02.2015 05:44, Warin wrote:
Within OSM .. I've checked
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:incline - that sets a 'standard'
for the incline direction.
I'm tempted to simply add the information to the wiki
On 28/02/2015 2:53 PM, John Willis wrote:
On Feb 27, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com mailto:dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-02-27 9:07 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
I read the wiki entry on steps
On Feb 27, 2015, at 8:09 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
2015-02-27 9:07 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
I read the wiki entry on steps
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps) and the discussion
page,
and besides the discussion on which
Am 27.02.2015 um 16:56 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2015-02-27 16:36 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
I think the easiest way to represent several upper and lower is to model
several stairs, one for each upper+lower combo. This can happen for
example
when there are blocks in the
2015-02-27 16:36 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Well, go for it.
tried now, but unfortunately I can't do it based on the current aerial
imagery (resolution of available imagery is insufficient). Could so some
estimates, but that doesn't seem appropriate and I'm also short on time
Am 27.02.2015 um 12:09 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2015-02-27 9:07 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
I read the wiki entry on steps (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps) and the
discussion page,
and besides the
I had assumed for years that the direction pointing upwards was a commonly
agreed on standard, being myself an architect I hadn't expected this to be
questionable, but as I got so much flak from people insisting on the other
way round,
Like me :-p (although not insisting).
Indeed, as a poor
Am 27.02.2015 um 16:16 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2015-02-27 14:24 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Though, I am not sure how to model steps with fading steps to one or
both sides and several upper or lower
I am not sure if I understand fading steps correctly. Usually I'd say
2015-02-27 14:24 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Though, I am not sure how to model steps with fading steps to one or
both sides and several upper or lower
I am not sure if I understand fading steps correctly. Usually I'd say
that the single step is there as long as there is any
2015-02-27 16:36 GMT+01:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
I think the easiest way to represent several upper and lower is to model
several stairs, one for each upper+lower combo. This can happen for
example
when there are blocks in the middle of the stairs.
Do I really need one relation
I read the wiki entry on steps
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps) and the discussion
page,
and besides the discussion on which direction means uphill (that really needs
to be decided), I had another big question -
27.02.2015, 14:33, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
On an architectural drawing, a stairway arrow points upwards.
As specified in international standard ISO 6790 .. and copied in British
Standards B.S. 1192 ... Australian/New Zealand Standards ANZS 1100... and
probably in American Standards
Hi johnw.
I think
highway=steps on way for routing
+ area:highway=steps on a polygon would be the best.
27.02.2015, 13:23, johnw jo...@mac.com:
I read the wiki entry on steps
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps) and the discussion
page,
and besides the discussion on
On 27/02/2015 7:39 PM, dkise...@osm.me wrote:
Hi johnw.
I think
highway=steps on way for routing
+ area:highway=steps on a polygon would be the best.
Good .. the Sydney Opera House and Sydney Town Hall all have wide area
steps ... they have tagged ways ... I'll have to check areas.
There is
On 27/02/2015 8:41 PM, dkise...@osm.me wrote:
27.02.2015, 14:33, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
On an architectural drawing, a stairway arrow points upwards.
As specified in international standard ISO 6790 .. and copied in British
Standards B.S. 1192 ... Australian/New Zealand Standards
On Feb 27, 2015, at 6:29 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
OSM should follow established standards when available
Sounds great! It looks like step direction has been bandied about for a while,
so maybe we should put it to a vote. Should we make some kind of proposal page?
Javbw
2015-02-27 9:07 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
I read the wiki entry on steps (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dsteps
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway=steps) and the
discussion page,
and besides the discussion on which direction means uphill (that really
22 matches
Mail list logo
