On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 01:49:26PM +, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 18/03/2015 11:58, Richard Z. wrote:
so should for example the OpenSeaMap tagging for bridges become
deprecated?
Not deprecated, but considered on a case-by-case basis. It is a question of
whether important navigation
On 19/03/2015 17:41, Richard Z. wrote:
do you have any background info regarding the many
obstacle nodes which are present in German waterways?
I don't. I found a key:obstacle page in the Wiki that associates it
OpenSeaMap - I don't know why the authors thought that. Those authors
are
On 18/03/2015 11:58, Richard Z. wrote:
so should for example the OpenSeaMap tagging for bridges become
deprecated?
Not deprecated, but considered on a case-by-case basis. It is a question
of whether important navigation information would be deleted if the
seamark tags were removed. In the
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 04:31:12PM +, Malcolm Herring wrote:
On 17/03/2015 16:06, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
Is there something I'm missing?
No, you have spotted the fact that (as always!) that the documentation is
unfinished. I had done it on this page:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 6:49 AM, Malcolm Herring
malcolm.herr...@btinternet.com wrote:
Not deprecated, but considered on a case-by-case basis. It is a question
of whether important navigation information would be deleted if the seamark
tags were removed. In the case of bridges, the safe air
On 17/03/2015 13:19, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
their tagging scheme is somehow a parallel universe,
Not parallel, but in some cases complimentary. For 95% of objects there
are no overlaps with standard OSM objects. It is those 5% of cases that
do overlap that people notice hence assume
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 08:50:48AM -0500, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
For boat navigation purposes this should be crosslinked:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/Gates
Isn't it the other way around? That is, the people who tagged
seagate:category:gate=lock (24 objects) should
Am 17.03.2015 um 13:28 schrieb Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com:
Actually in some cases I am wondering if the OpenSeaMap tags
are really usefull where other tags exist
+1, this has been a problem since the beginning of OpenSeaMap, their tagging
scheme is somehow a parallel universe,
On 17/03/2015 16:06, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
Is there something I'm missing?
No, you have spotted the fact that (as always!) that the documentation
is unfinished. I had done it on this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/INT-1_Cross_Reference but
I need to add notes/links on
We always recommend that all natural and cultural features are tagged as
per OSM Wiki only add Seamark tags where there is a non-coincident
definition and the nautical definition is of special navigational
importance.
Locks their gates do not fall into that category so we do not
For boat navigation purposes this should be crosslinked:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenSeaMap/Gates
Isn't it the other way around? That is, the people who tagged
seagate:category:gate=lock (24 objects) should be making sure to also tag
waterway=lock_gate (15K objects), not vice
According to wiki[1] waterway=lock_gate should be used only on nodes. Some
are tagged on
ways[2]. Why wiki considers node as the only valid element where this tag
may be used? Is it
because page is older than mapping rivers also as areas? Routing for boats?
Some other reason?
Is it a good idea to
2015-03-16 10:53 GMT+01:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
According to wiki[1] waterway=lock_gate should be used only on nodes. Some
are tagged on
ways[2]. Why wiki considers node as the only valid element where this tag
may be used? Is it
because page is older than mapping rivers
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:53:21AM +0100, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
According to wiki[1] waterway=lock_gate should be used only on nodes. Some
are tagged on
ways[2]. Why wiki considers node as the only valid element where this tag
may be used? Is it
because page is older than mapping rivers
On 16/03/2015 10:37, Richard Z. wrote:
I think it makes sense to tag them as ways, analogous to weirs and dams.
+1
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 3:14 AM, Dave Swarthout daveswarth...@gmail.com
wrote:
On the other hand, these features are actually a linear barrier with a
finite length that extend across a channel or canal. It makes sense to
allow tagging them as ways as well as nodes.
If you're a router
On 16/03/2015 16:35, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
If you're a router following a way, having the node marked makes the job
easier.
Is that not tagging for an app?
A similar case is bridges. Here the bridge tag could be on a segment of
the way over the bridge, the way under the bridge, a node on
I'm embarrassed to admit I have tagged 82 of those features as ways here in
Thailand. I guess I simply never thought to look at the Wiki because it
seemed so obvious to me that most lock_gates cross the waterway. These
features are not rendered on any OSM map I've seen so my mistakes never
came to
18 matches
Mail list logo
