Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-03-04 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-26 9:43 GMT+01:00 Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de: yes, that is the point of the thread opener: man_made=works does not make sense for one building only. I always tag man_made=works for the whole area of a work/factory complex of one operator (as one object). as there don't

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-26 Thread Georg Feddern
Am 25.02.2014 22:06, schrieb John Packer: Then I think I am confused too. As the description is right now, what is the difference between building=factory and man_made=works ? yes, that is the point of the thread opener: man_made=works does not make sense for one building only. I always tag

[Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Currently the wiki states that man_made=works is a tag for buildings, while IMHO it would be better to see it as a tag for a factory (partly already confirmed by actual current tagging). This should be used similar to amenity=school etc. and comprise the whole area of the plant, while singular

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Pieren
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: similar to amenity=school etc. and comprise the whole area of the plant, while singular buildings can be tagged as specific buildings. Why not. But what about this sentence : landuse=industrial to show the area

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:10 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com: Why not. But what about this sentence : landuse=industrial to show the area around the building. ? IMHO the building should be included. There's no problem in tagging all areas that are industrially used with landuse=industrial,

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:27 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com: Am 25/feb/2014 um 17:10 schrieb Pieren pier...@gmail.com: Why not. But what about this sentence : landuse=industrial to show the area around the building. ? IMHO the building should be included.

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread John Packer
There is an interesting question on this tag's talk page: I think it collide with building=industrial, building=factory and landuse=industrial and i propose to delete this Tag. Or why should we use this Tag? cptechnik - Peter Coenen -

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-25 17:44 GMT+01:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com: There is an interesting question on this tag's talk page: I think it collide with building=industrial, building=factory and landuse=industrial and i propose to delete this Tag. Or why should we use this Tag? I think he is

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread John Packer
Then I think I am confused too. As the description is right now, what is the difference between building=factory and man_made=works ? Do note that product=* and/or produce=* is not necessarily tied to man_made=works. I see man_made=works is much more used than building=factory, so I probably am

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2014-02-25 22:06 GMT+01:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com: difference between building=factory and man_made=works the building tag describes a (single) building and its typology while man_made=works is about a production plant with possibly lots of buildings and open areas, infrastructure

Re: [Tagging] wiki definition for man_made=works

2014-02-25 Thread Janko Mihelić
A building=factory can also have amenity=restaurant if a restaurant is using an old factory building. I agree with the starting proposal to make man_made=works not neccesarily a building. Janko Dana 25. 2. 2014. 22:08 osoba John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com napisala je: Then I think I am