Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

On 4/8/20 7:17 am, Joseph Eisenberg wrote: Everyone, the voting period for natural=bare_ground is still open for 4 more days. I would recommend voting "no" on the current definition, unfortunately. As mentioned above, the current definition is far too broad, and could easily be construed to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

Thanks for the heads up Joseph. I also read what Imagico wrote1 and voted no. I recommend others to do the same. Cheers pangoSE 1 https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Proposed_features/Ground=253931=2016970=2016363 Joseph Eisenberg skrev: (3 augusti 2020 23:17:18 CEST)

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

Everyone, the voting period for natural=bare_ground is still open for 4 more days. I would recommend voting "no" on the current definition, unfortunately. As mentioned above, the current definition is far too broad, and could easily be construed to include areas under construction, areas of bare

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

sent from a phone > On 27. Jul 2020, at 13:41, Michael Montani wrote: > > I eventually found on-the-ground images of the feature I would like to > propose / map. are these suggested to be represented as polygons? How would the border be determined? I looks from the imagery as if there is

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

On Friday 24 July 2020, Paul Allen wrote: > > I take it that means you're not in favour of my idea of rendering all > parts of the world not covered by a tagged area with the label "Here > there be dragons." I think that would be cool, especially if > somebody comes up with a good dragon icon.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 14:50, Christoph Hormann wrote: > In OSM we generally think that using an open tagging system where the > tags are narrowly defined in what the positively mean in a locally > verifiable fashion is better for representing the global geography in > all its diversity and to

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

On Friday 24 July 2020, Michael Montani wrote: > > The voting for natural=bare_soil has begun and can be found > hereing>. It will temptatively close August 7th, given enough support. It is unfortunate that the suggestion to not

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - (Ground: natural=bare_soil)

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ground#Tagging is listing multiple methods to map this, what is not a good idea. I am confused a bit as mailing list message mentioned single value. Maybe it is list of considered but rejected alternatives? Jul 24, 2020, 09:52 by