Okay, we have 9 votes:
- 5 times approve
- 3 times oppose
- 1 time obstain
I suppose this is not enough?
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-28 14:48 GMT+00:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
Hello.
After discussion and some modifications of the proposal, here a request
for voting on “Tagging for
Hello all.
At
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tagging_for_complex_junctions_or_traffic_signals_that_are_named
there is still a proposal for complex junctions and traffic signal systems
in voting process. Participation is appreciated ;-)
Regards
Lukas
Lukas Sommer
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:56 PM, fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com wrote:
Once more cite a mail on the previous thread [1]
Seems to be a real world example, which is mappable with nodes for the
traffic_signals and an area for the junction.
You even don't need an area if the junction is a node
2014-09-29 23:45 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
The case of Japan is different. In Japan, the name belongs to the _traffic
signal_, and _not_ to the junction. We need to distinguish this, because
they are usually differently rendered (traffic signal names usually with an
icon and
Oh, sorry, Pieren was faster… ;-)
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-30 12:34 GMT+00:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
If there is a need to tag traffic signal names and junction names on the
same node, then the logical solution is junction:name=* and
traffic_signals:name=*. Or in different languages:
What would also be no problem, because you can give an individual name=*
tag to each node with highway=traffic_signals and another name=* tag to the
area.
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-30 18:56 GMT+00:00 fly lowfligh...@googlemail.com:
Am 30.09.2014 14:34, schrieb Lukas Sommer:
If there is a need to
On 29.09.2014 05:14, Никита wrote:
Should we discourage usage of this tag(s) outside Korea and Japan? (I
will vote yes for this part)
a lot of people in Thailand will be mad at you then...
Having named junctions is quite common.
Stephan
___
a lot of people in Thailand will be mad at you then...
Well, yes, Thailand also, but this tag will be truly meaningful for limited
number of countries. I think we should reflect that.
Having named junctions is quite common.
Do you mean personal name? There very-very few named junctions in
Do you mean spersonal name/s proper noun?
2014-09-29 14:21 GMT+04:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com:
a lot of people in Thailand will be mad at you then...
Well, yes, Thailand also, but this tag will be truly meaningful for
limited number of countries. I think we should reflect that.
Having
On 29.09.2014 12:21, Никита wrote:
Having named junctions is quite common.
Do you mean personal name? There very-very few named junctions in Russia
and almost all of them are local names, not official. Ex:
Thailand has official signs naming the junctions/intersections. These
names are also
Can you please provide examples how to draw area for more complicated
junctions?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tagging_for_complex_junctions_or_traffic_signals_that_are_named
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-29 3:14 GMT+00:00 Никита acr...@gmail.com:
Not enough examples, I cannot
Thailand has official signs naming the junctions/intersections. These
names are also used when you give directions.
As Imagic suggested, it not best way to use different tags for close
meanings, single tag will be better option:
junction=th:junction_area
junction=jp:junction_area
The case of Japan is different. In Japan, the name belongs to the _traffic
signal_, and _not_ to the junction. We need to distinguish this, because
they are usually differently rendered (traffic signal names usually with an
icon and junction names usually without an icon).
But what would we gain
@Lukas
But what would we gain when we distinguish between th:junction_area and
kr:junction_area - because here we have two values for the same feature.
I assume what is desired is to have the ability to provide those two values
in different languages. Usually the language suffix is found on the
So, if you have an intersection of two streets, with one traffic signal facing
each direction, each of the four traffic signals will have its own distinct
name?
On September 29, 2014 4:45:33 PM CDT, Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com wrote:
The case of Japan is different. In Japan, the name
Dave, no, my intention was to describe them similar to maxspeed=DE:,
maxspeed=IT: values, not tags. But as Lukas Sommer said
In Japan, the name belongs to the _traffic signal_, and _not_ to the
junction.
But since only Japan is different there no need to use prefixed values with
different meaning
A link is missing.
2014-09-28 16:48 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
Hello.
After discussion and some modifications of the proposal, here a request
for voting on “Tagging for complex junctions or traffic signals that are
named“.
This is an important feature in some regions in
Oh, sorry, I missed this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Tagging_for_complex_junctions_or_traffic_signals_that_are_named
Lukas Sommer
2014-09-28 20:47 GMT+00:00 Mateusz Konieczny matkoni...@gmail.com:
A link is missing.
2014-09-28 16:48 GMT+02:00 Lukas Sommer
Not enough examples, I cannot vote yes right now. Can you please provide
examples how to draw area for more complicated junctions? For 3, 4 or 5
roads? Example with roundabout (should we include inside area)? For
junction with 2 or many roundabouts (how we should include all these small
areas
I can see this being somewhat practical in North America, but the tagging
for North American examples tends to fall within existing standards. Take
Coe Circle in Portland or Bartlett Square in Tulsa for example. And ignore
the fact that Bartlett Square is round
On Sep 28, 2014 10:15 PM,
20 matches
Mail list logo
