Re: [Tagging] RFC: crossing=* (was: highway=speed_camera equivalent for non-speed enforcement types)

2014-07-22 Thread André Pirard
On 2014-07-22 11:01, Jo wrote : FYI it doesn't seem likely that the event of dropping highway=bus_stop or highway=speed_camera will be dropped in a foreseeable future, meaning you'll have to keep double tagging everything. In Belgium all red light cameras do double duty as speed cameras, so I

Re: [Tagging] RFC: crossing=* (was: highway=speed_camera equivalent for non-speed enforcement types)

2014-07-22 Thread Dan S
2014-07-22 10:43 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: On 2014-07-22 11:01, Jo wrote : I have mentioned without much follow-up a similar issue with highway=crossing + crossing=*. What OSM calls crossing, zebra stripes, is in fact a passage pour piétons which does not necessarily

Re: [Tagging] RFC: crossing=* (was: highway=speed_camera equivalent for non-speed enforcement types)

2014-07-22 Thread Volker Schmidt
I have tagged, occasionally, longitudinal zebra markings as designated foot-way, which seems to me better than crossing on ways. Volker Italy On 22 July 2014 12:00, Dan S danstowell+...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-22 10:43 GMT+01:00 André Pirard a.pirard.pa...@gmail.com: On 2014-07-22 11:01,