Re: [Tagging] unless someone objects: amenity=truck_rental

2011-08-01 Thread John Smith
On 1 August 2011 12:00, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: amenity=car_rental rental:truck=yes Works now and in the future. You could always dual tag and at some point in the future have a bot clean things up. shop=rental rental:plant=yes* Works in the future. Steve * plant

Re: [Tagging] mapping static museum ships

2011-08-01 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/1 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com: should be usefully shown on a map. I don't know if we have a strict definition of building but I would go with something like a man-made structure with walls that is by default inaccessible to the average pedestrian. generally walls are not a

Re: [Tagging] Named gates

2011-08-01 Thread Josh Doe
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com wrote: But there's no reason to change the tagging in my view. Just make a ticket and see if the mapnik team is willing to render those. Right,

Re: [Tagging] Named gates

2011-08-01 Thread Craig Wallace
On 01/08/2011 13:12, Josh Doe wrote: On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com mailto:bill.n1...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Sander Deryckere sander...@gmail.com mailto:sander...@gmail.com wrote: But there's no reason to change the

Re: [Tagging] mapping static museum ships

2011-08-01 Thread Pieren
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 10:57 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: generally walls are not a requirement for buildings, a roof is. Accessibility to pedestrians is some sub-property I wouldn't add to the building definition. In my street, there is a long parking metal box