At 2012-07-27 15:23, Pieren wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> Just to be clear, this is exactly the case I envision, and something our
> crowd-source model should be good at - people seeing/knowing from local
> knowledge that a restaurant has a certain star rating and r
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alan Mintz
wrote:
> Just to be clear, this is exactly the case I envision, and something our
> crowd-source model should be good at - people seeing/knowing from local
> knowledge that a restaurant has a certain star rating and recording and
> maintaining it in OSM.
Werner Poppele wrote:
> In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park.
> Is
> that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems
> to
> be not quite correct IMHO.
>
> taginfo
> landuse=trailer_park 8
> amenity=trailer_park 23
> tourism=camp_site
In the US (context established in first post), "trailer park" nearly always
refers to a residential subdivision where people buy small lots, and then
place mobile homes on those lots for permanent residence. I would suggest
tagging the area with landuse=residential, and possibly some kind of
subta
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:28 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
> At 2012-07-27 06:54, Werner Poppele wrote:
> >In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
> >that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
> >be not quite correct IMHO.
> >
> >taginfo
>
At 2012-07-27 06:54, Werner Poppele wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park8
amenity=trailer_park23
tourism=camp_site
Werner Poppele writes:
> In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged
> landuse=trailer_park. Is that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag
> tourism=camp_site seems to be not quite correct IMHO.
>
> taginfo
> landuse=trailer_park 8
> amenity=trailer_park 23
> tourism=camp_site 40196
I'd agree, it definitely doesn't look like a trailer park or camp site.
Landuse=residential would cover it without you having to get into
wordsmithing. There was some discussion on extending landuse=residential
with residential=* tags:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:Key:landuse#Refining_l
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Werner Poppele wrote:
> In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
> that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to be
> not quite correct IMHO.
>
> taginfo
> landuse=trailer_park8
> amenity=trailer_park
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Werner Poppele wrote:
> In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
> that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to be
> not quite correct IMHO.
tourism=camp_site with the caravans=yes is potentially appropri
At 2012-07-27 00:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But of course we weren't talking about the photo per se, but about the
question whether you could put the rating in the OSM database, and I
believe that even if the Michelin rating is displayed in a way so artful
that it attracts copyright, the *fact* t
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park8
amenity=trailer_park23
tourism=camp_site 40196
WernerP
[1] http://www.openst
Am 26.07.2012 um 23:29 schrieb Alan Mintz :
>
>
> I suggest "award:="
+1
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Apart from the legal aspects, which exclude it anyway, I find it completely
wrong to copy data statically into OSM that is by definition variable
(TripAdvisor "awards" are automatically generated data from user input).
Such data should not be inserted into the OSM database.
A similar argument goes
Hi,
On 07/27/2012 09:14 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Now that the redaction is finished, is there a need to keep any odbl=clean
tags, or does it make sense to remove them if making other edits to objects.
I think they can be "phased out" in this way. They're not needed any
more. They should be treat
I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl
to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Martijn van Exel rtijn.org> writes:
> Linked data is not about linking to every possible source from one
> source, but rather publishing your data as RDF thus allowing linkages
> with other datasets. See here[1].
> I don't think it gets much attention in the OSM community, and I don't
> claim to
Hi,
On 07/27/2012 02:02 AM, Michael Kugelmann wrote:
At least in Germany, a photographer may not photograph anything in
public view and claim ownership; it is possible that photographing
e.g. a work of art and then using that photo requires consent from the
rights holder even though the object w
Now that the redaction is finished, is there a need to keep any odbl=clean
tags, or does it make sense to remove them if making other edits to objects.
--
Alan Mintz
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
19 matches
Mail list logo
