Am 23/lug/2014 um 21:43 schrieb Christian Quest cqu...@openstreetmap.fr:
Have you looked at taginfo ?
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/?key=aerodrome#overview
aerodrome=international is already in use, it is even the first in quantity
(157)
+1, I think the wiki page should
Am 24/lug/2014 um 00:55 schrieb Fernando Trebien fernando.treb...@gmail.com:
aerodrome=international would mean a public airport/aerodrome that
primarily enables regular citizens to hire flights directly to other
countries, and to achieve this it would need some supporting
infrastructure
Is there a reason to keep sport=horse_racing?
Equestrian seems to defined as
This broad description includes the use of horses for practical working
purposes, transportation, recreational activities, artistic or cultural
exercises, and competitive sport (!!!).
On 24/07/2014 10:35, Andreas Goss wrote:
Is there a reason to keep sport=horse_racing?
horse racing is a very different animal (pun intended) to e.g 3 day
eventing, country point-to-points, gymkhanas, etc.
Cheers,
Andy
___
Tagging mailing list
horse racing is a very different animal (pun intended) to e.g 3 day
eventing, country point-to-points, gymkhanas, etc.
But do you plan to tag those with sport=horse_3_day_eventing,
sport=horse_country_point-to-points and sport=hose_gymkhana?
Because I have the impression they are all still
On 24 July 2014 00:10, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Thanks for pointing that out to me. As I said, I personally had no problem
with 'NR' but I'd be OK with it's removal is there was some king of infill.
ATM there is none it looks virtually invisible.
I'm not sure if this is in the
Maybe [sport=equestrian; equestrian=racing] would be better?
2014-07-24 11:52 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de:
horse racing is a very different animal (pun intended) to e.g 3 day
eventing, country point-to-points, gymkhanas, etc.
But do you plan to tag those with
2014-07-24 1:01 GMT+02:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
My Main question is on my understanding of the landuse+building tagging
scheme.
I don't think there is a 1:1 relationship. building describes the type of
the building, while landuse the _use_ of the land.
Just yesterday evening I saw a mosque in
2014-07-24 1:01 GMT+02:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
My Main question is on my understanding of the landuse+building tagging
scheme.
I don't think there is a 1:1 relationship. building describes the type of
the building, while landuse the _use_ of the land.
Just yesterday evening I saw a mosque in
It is kind of a proposal, but it isn't in the sense that I don't want to be
responsible for it.
I know little beyond the basics of aerodrome, and currently do not have the
interest of researching this much further.
If anyone thinks this should be a proposal, and know enough about
aerodromes to do
How to tag road junction names and traffic signal names?
Background:
In some countries (Japan, Korea, Ivory Coast…) people orient themselves in
the local area using the names of road junctions (like crossroads or
roundabouts) or traffic signals rather then the names of streets. While
street names
I'm not familiar with them, maybe they'd just be instances of
aerodrome=private if the user needs to own a plane or be the pilot, or if
permission to fly is given not by a flight authority but by a third party
such as the aerodrome owner. Or maybe these would be new values for
aerodrome=*.
On 24
2014-07-24 14:11 GMT+02:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
If anyone thinks this should be a proposal, and know enough about
aerodromes to do so, feel free to make one.
thing is that right now it looks as if this was state of the art, i.e. an
established scheme, what it surely isn't,
Have you looked at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key%3Ajunction
*junction*=yes http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:junction%3Dyes can
be useful for a simple junction node that has a name
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name=*
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:name%3D* tag
I'm
Yes, I know that junction=yes works fine for simple crossroads. My question
is: How should we map complex junctions like
http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2351057522#map=19/5.34399/-4.00300 Using
just an unconnected node like in this example (even after removing the
wrong place=hamlet tag) maybe
If place=hamlet is wrong, I believe place=locality is often used as a
generic tag for nodes indicating named locations. Not really a
solution but a simple option.
Dan
2014-07-24 17:01 GMT+01:00 Lukas Sommer sommer...@gmail.com:
Yes, I know that junction=yes works fine for simple crossroads. My
junction=yes will probably be rendered by openstreetmap-carto soon.
However:
– Can we accept a simple (not connected) node with junction=yes and name=*
in spite of the problems in turn-to-turn navigation?
– Is using a relation for this to complicate? But it would be a clean
solution to have the
Am 24.07.2014 12:26, schrieb Mateusz Konieczny:
Maybe [sport=equestrian; equestrian=racing] would be better?
2014-07-24 11:52 GMT+02:00 Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de
mailto:andi...@t-online.de:
horse racing is a very different animal (pun intended) to e.g
3 day
Martin,
Sorry, I should have talked a little about the history behind this before.
Initially aeroway=aerodrome used the key type=* to further classify it's
type.
Nowadays, the key type=* is infamous because it is the de facto way of
especifying relation's types, and therefore shouldn't be used
2014-07-24 19:04 GMT+02:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
Martin,
Sorry, I should have talked a little about the history behind this before.
Initially aeroway=aerodrome used the key type=* to further classify it's
type.
This looks like 90% of the values describe if it's a military or
The problem with type=* is that you have no clue on what it relates...
When an object combines for example amenity=* and building=*, type is
related to which one ?
Most OSM tags are hierarchical:
aeroway = aerodrome
aerodrome = *
When investigating taginfo, also check WHERE unusual values are
2014-07-24 19:04 GMT+02:00 John Packer john.pack...@gmail.com:
I am working on the key's aerodrome in the hope it can substitute the key
type=* on classifying an aerodrome, because it conflicts with relations
like multipolygon (as shown above).
I will also include this information in the
Martin - thanks for the thoughtful reply.
I read it carefully, and I think you kind of misunderstood me again, please
bare with me.
On Jul 24, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-24 1:01 GMT+02:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
My Main question is on my
23 matches
Mail list logo
