On 09.02.2015 15:31, Lukas Schaus wrote:
My proposal concerning the modelling of traffic signals is now open for
voting.
Oh dear. I had hoped to discuss the mapping of physical traffic signal
locations with you before the vote. I was not aware that you had planned
to vote after just 1 week of
i don't see the potential for confusion since this is a relation.
Maybe you can elaborate why this could be a problem since
i am not aware.
Without reading the documentation, I would expect to
type=traffic_signals to be something very similar to
highway=traffic_signals. But
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 20:38 +, Lukas Sommer wrote:
I know that I’m a little late with this comment – I missed this while
reading the proposal. Sorry.
Maybe that’s something that can be changed in the prososal – if
current voters agree?
2015-02-09 17:29 GMT, Lukas Sommer
On 9/02/2015 10:50 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-02-07 1:12 GMT+01:00 Jo winfi...@gmail.com
mailto:winfi...@gmail.com:
Keep in mind it's only a model to represent reality. A model which
uses lines for what in reality are areas, so whatever we do, it
will never be a perfect
On 9/02/2015 1:59 PM, David Bannon wrote:
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 09:15 +1100, Warin wrote:
A proposal for a new high level tag of .. Rubbish :-)
Sigh ... .
I find it amusing..
Thirdly, dare I say this, will someone argue rubbish= indicates that
there is rubbish there, on that spot ?
My feelingsis this not something for a separate study by someone rather
than a feature on OSM? Keeping this kind of information updated will be an
impossibilitymany cities are becoming computerised and the signals
adjusted according to the traffic conditions along that road. At best the
2015-02-10 11:29 GMT+01:00 Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk:
This does seem very complicated, I cannot see much take up by mappers on
the ground.
Traffic signal timing varies by time of day, day of week, and traffic
density. Many traffic signals can be remotely controlled to clear
Hi,
i am sorry i must have missed your comment where you mentioned it
before. I am not this experienced in OSM, but i don't see the
potential for confusion since this is a relation. Maybe you can
elaborate why this could be a problem since i am not aware. The name
does maybe not match to
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:09 +, AYTOUN RALPH wrote:
My feelingsis this not something for a separate study by someone
rather than a feature on OSM? Keeping this kind of information updated
will be an impossibilitymany cities are becoming computerised
and the signals adjusted
fly lowflight66 at googlemail.com, Mon Feb 9 15:47:00 UTC 2015
You did not comment on my question about micromapping a junction and
adding a highway=traffic_signal at the pedestrian crossing or the stop
line for each direction separately. Have a look at the examples below
[1],[2].
For
Still do not see any need for a relation once we have micromapped enough
and this should be the prior quest.
What I totally miss are options for operating_time. I won't be able to
tag the phase as many other did already mention but I can tell you the
times when traffic_signals are usually
On 6/02/2015 11:22 AM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
There are cases where an approximate temperature is more useful than a
single scalar number.
For example a drinking fountain may be chilled, but not operating at
a single fixed temperature.
Similarly there's a big difference in a tropical climate
Hi,
Can anyone make sense out of this?
About: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim/Special_Phrases/FR
Two columns prepended to the table, second: Y=works, N=does not.
All OSM queries are appended with the place name Dolembreux.
Seeing that #1 works, I add the alternate #2 and it doesn't.
13 matches
Mail list logo
