Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

W dniu 02.10.2016 18:10, Topographe Fou napisał(a): To summarize quickly: It says that railway=station should only be a node (not an shape or a polygon or even an area) and that you should use landuse=railway and building=* to represent the physical infrastructure in other objects. Whatever we

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

Hi,I know that some consider the wiki as a not-trustable thing but when I read the dedicated page there is a third POV which makes more sense for me and which may explain why you add an extra area tag.http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:railway%3DstationTo summarize quickly: It says that

[Tagging] Setting as access=official as abandoned/deprecated

I want to set the access=official proposal[1] to abandoned and the feature page[2] to deprecated. Since this tag is mostly used in Germany I have documented the case in the german forum[3] and got only positive feedback so far. Key points in english: - compared to designated, official is used

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

sent from a phone > Il giorno 01 ott 2016, alle ore 18:50, John Willis ha scritto: > > So as other tags have different behavior on a pin vs a building vs a > non-building, I expected the renderings of railway=station to be different > when the area=yes tag is present . Am I

Re: [Tagging] Railway=station + area=yes questions:

sent from a phone > Il giorno 01 ott 2016, alle ore 18:50, John Willis ha scritto: > > I have a long thread over at The -carto page trying to describe unexpected > behavior of the rendering of railway=station on an area when also accompanied > with area=yes. > > I expect