Re: [Tagging] Spillways

> On Mar 25, 2017, at 12:54 AM, Richard wrote: > > This would include most > levees even if we usualy don't map them explicitly. We have a dyke tag because the levees do not block the flow of the river. They prevent it from flooding out of the path the river is already

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

I would start a "definitive thread" with all the options, all the possibilities, all the points of view, all the information and then, passing all to the wiki with a votting or aproved by list complete proposal. Some people is watching us and in a near future will try to collaboret with us so it

[Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - amenity=courier

Please vote for the proposal, https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcourier Kelvin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] Spillways

On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 09:42:35AM +0900, John Willis wrote: > > The thing I am tagging is not a dam. It is a series of flood basins, one of > which is a "reservoir". They are made by levees that surround the rivers, but > in a very complicated way. They eventually return all the water back to

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 07:22:44 -0700 Tod Fitch wrote: > > It is not clear what we have gained by spitting the original topic > into multiple parts. Nothing... Had I been aware of the other thread I would probably not have started this one ! Oh well... 'git merge' for mailing

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

> On Mar 24, 2017, at 7:04 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:15:41 +0100 > yo paseopor wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer >> wrote: On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

On Fri, 24 Mar 2017 00:15:41 +0100 yo paseopor wrote: > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 9:03 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier > > > wrote: > > > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward

Re: [Tagging] Spillways

2017-03-24 1:42 GMT+01:00 John Willis : > > The thing I am tagging is not a dam. It is a series of flood basins, one > of which is a "reservoir". They are made by levees that surround the > rivers, but in a very complicated way. They eventually return all the water > back to the

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 21:03:47 +0100 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > On 23 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > > > > - highway=stop+direction=forward node on the incoming way... Only > > covers the simple case but covers it simply > > >

Re: [Tagging] Spillways

> On Mar 24, 2017, at 9:42 AM, John Willis wrote: > > The thing I am tagging is not a dam. It is a series of flood basins, one of > which is a "reservoir". They are made by levees that surround the rivers, but > in a very complicated way. They eventually return all the water

Re: [Tagging] Traffic sign's relevant direction: direction=* vs. relation [Was: traffic_signals:direction=* vs. direction=*]

It's a different topic: speed, height... Mainly apply to a way whereas stops mainly (always ?) apply to a node. Speeds can still be tagged on the way and the sign put appart from the road, mainly for rendering purpose because the way it applies to is already tagged with the consequence (the