On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:59 PM, Jmapb wrote:
>
> This reminds me of something I've been meaning to ask the list... I've got
> a lot of psychics in the area. I've been tagging them shop=psychic because
> that's what the signs say, but I don't really feel OSM ought to be
> endorsing unverifiable
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 22:50, marc marc wrote:
>
> but I never see a building having a "public typology or style".
e.g. courthouses, townhalls, office buildings for the public administration,
etc.
___
Tagging mailing list
Le 04. 07. 18 à 20:04, Martin Koppenhoefer a écrit :
> You can interpret building=public as a building erected for the public
> administration
why a building was erected is not describing what it look like.
some "public" building look like as a building=residential or house,
or
Good evening everybody
As power mapping goes on in France, we use to find some power substation in
street cabinets like in many countries.
Those cabinets often host a single transformer to step down voltage for
households (and its a power substation since there are switches with the
transformer
On 7/4/2018 4:29 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your tithe
or put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if you don't go to
heaven, or there's no afterlife at all, simply
return and make a
On 05/07/18 08:32, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
sent from a phone
On 4. Jul 2018, at 22:50, marc marc wrote:
but I never see a building having a "public typology or style".
e.g. courthouses, townhalls, office buildings for the public administration,
etc.
Just as some miss tag an area of
On 05/07/18 08:59, Jmapb wrote:
On 7/4/2018 4:29 PM, Paul Allen wrote:
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your
tithe or put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And there's a money-back guarantee: if you don't go to
heaven, or there's no afterlife at
On 7/4/2018 7:08 PM, Warin wrote:
Shops sell physical objects e.g. bread, vegetables, paper.
These .. people .. don't sell physical objects .. so they are not a
shop. There are, at best, an office.
I think of them as shops in the same sense as shop=hairdresser. office
seems a bit.. off. I
Search in this list for "[Tagging] Manor tagging" around march 14th.
The manor is the area around the house (la finca)
The manor house it the house itself.
Yours,
José Moya
El 4/7/2018 12:36 PM, "César Martínez Izquierdo"
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic
Hi,
I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhouses ("masías"
[1], "caseríos" [2] "cortijos", "pazos", etc), since I find no proper
value of "historic" for them.
They are prominent buildings that are spread all over the country,
dating from at least the XVII century and in some cases
In the Veneto region of Italy there are about 300 Venetian Villas tagged as
"historic=manor" plus "manor:type=venetian_villa" [1]
This could be a model, as the historic function of those villas was most
likely very similar to the ones listed in your post. [2]
[1] http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/A3H
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 11:34 AM, César Martínez Izquierdo <
cesar@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I wonder the best way to tag Spanish historic farmhouses ("masías"
> [1], "caseríos" [2] "cortijos", "pazos", etc), since I find no proper
> value of "historic" for them.
>
I suggest you contact the
On Wednesday 04 July 2018, César Martínez Izquierdo wrote:
>
> I wonder if option 1 (manor) is too specific to UK or it can be
> applied also to these kind of building.
>
> OSM wiki states: "The manor tag is intended only for representative
> buildings that are in the same time the administrative
you should discuss this on talk-it as well.
You can find more information here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import
Cheers,
Martin
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 14:09, Carmine Massarelli
> wrote:
>
> Dear,
> I would like to contribute to Osm updating all the opening time of
On 7/4/2018 10:47 AM, César Martínez Izquierdo wrote:
The exception that I've seen is building=public -- this seems most often
to indicate the current use rather than the style.
it's why it's depreciated a long time ago.
Is it? It's never been removed from the wiki. But it's definitely an
Le 04. 07. 18 à 15:51, Jmapb a écrit :
> On 7/4/2018 7:23 AM, marc marc wrote:
>
>> Le 04. 07. 18 à 12:34, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit :
>>> I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g.
>>> building=hotel
>> the building tag is what the building look like
>> so
On 7/4/2018 7:23 AM, marc marc wrote:
Le 04. 07. 18 à 12:34, César Martínez Izquierdo a écrit :
I think that the best way is to tag their current use (e.g.
building=hotel
the building tag is what the building look like
so building=castel for exemple
the current use of a bulding is
sent from a phone
> On 4. Jul 2018, at 17:32, Jmapb wrote:
>
> But it's definitely an outlier.
it is not necessarily an outlier. You can interpret building=public as a
building erected for the public administration, regardless of current use.
Cheers,
Martin
I'd suggest something like access=customers, but that comes off as
cheeky when you're talking about religion. So maybe access=adherents?
J
On 6/29/2018 3:55 PM, Erkin Alp Güney wrote:
islam=only.
29-06-2018 21:35 tarihinde Mateusz Konieczny yazdı:
I thought about it but it is not clear
On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 9:16 PM, Jmapb wrote:
> I'd suggest something like access=customers, but that comes off as cheeky
> when you're talking about religion.
>
Seems OK to me. They're selling after-life insurance. Pay your tithe or
put money on the collection plate and you
go to heaven. And
20 matches
Mail list logo
