Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

ср, 30 янв. 2019 г. в 13:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > Large means? > Small means? > > To me I'd use small = I can step over it, large means I cannot step over > it .. so ~1.1 metres is the line between the two. > Drains and ditches can be 0.1 to 5 metres wide. You can hardly step over a

[Tagging] fence with wall base

Hi, How can I. edit a wall+fence with height details? for exemple: barrier=wall;fence height=2 level=0 barrier:part:0=wall barrier:part:0:height=0.50 barrier:part:0:material=masonry barrier:part:1:fence

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

Here is a summary of the discussion to check if there is a consensus. Current definitions of artificial waterways are unclear and ambiguous. Some people assume that ditch and drain differ mainly in size, others differentiate them mainly on liquid type (can or cannot carry industrial discharge),

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

Large means? Small means? To me I'd use small = I can step over it, large means I cannot step over it .. so ~1.1 metres is the line between the two. On 30/01/19 19:56, Eugene Podshivalov wrote: Here is a summary of the discussion to check if there is a consensus. Current definitions of

Re: [Tagging] fence with wall base

Le 30.01.19 à 09:41, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > How can I. edit a wall+fence with height details? > barrier=wall;fence > 0 is base of the barrier same as building barrier=fence barrier:height=1.50 barrier:type=chain_link support=wall support:height=0.50 support:material=masonry

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch

Those descriptions look good On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 5:58 PM Eugene Podshivalov wrote: > Here is a summary of the discussion to check if there is a consensus. > > Current definitions of artificial waterways are unclear and ambiguous. > Some people assume that ditch and drain differ mainly in

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs. ditch

Message: 4 Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 13:15:41 +0300 From: Eugene Podshivalov To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" Subject: Re: [Tagging] Drain vs ditch ср, 30 янв. 2019 г. в 13:02, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: Large means? Small means? To me I'd use small = I can step

Re: [Tagging] The actual use of the level tag

I stumbled upon a real-world example yesterday that may make the attempt to have the level-tag describe a "global" order (as used in OpenLevelUp, JOSM etc.) somewhat impractical - with that level-selector UI element: So, Hamburg is a really flat city. And even still, the mall "Europa Passage"

[Tagging] Drain vs ditch

check if there is a consensus on this, because there are probably > > many participants who have dropped out given the number of emails > > that > > the subject has generated > > ___ > > Tagging mailing li

Re: [Tagging] fence with wall base

thank marc I do that Le mer. 30 janv. 2019 à 10:47, marc marc a écrit : > Le 30.01.19 à 09:41, Jérôme Seigneuret a écrit : > > How can I. edit a wall+fence with height details? > > barrier=wall;fence > > 0 is base of the barrier same as building > > barrier=fence > barrier:height=1.50 >

[Tagging] Drain vs. ditch

I would rather add a specific section in the wiki page about width with the explanations you just provided to make the point clear once for all. > Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 18:28:50 +0300 > From: Eugene Podshivalov yauge...@gmail.com > To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools" >

Re: [Tagging] Drain vs. ditch

There are words in the language which let you distinguish natural waterways by size, e.g. brook -> stream -> river. The artifical waterways on the contrary are distinguished maily by usage, rather than by size: canal - carry useful water ditch - melioration chanals which are in contact with the

Re: [Tagging] The actual use of the level tag

On 2019-01-20 05:49, Tobias Zwick wrote: Hi there, In the wiki, the level tag is defined to be a 0-based-index so that level=0 is the ground floor, i.e. at the street level. In other words, a two-storey mall with no basement will have shops at level=0 and level=1. This is intuitive for (at

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On 31/01/19 07:20, Minh Nguyen wrote: On 2019-01-26 15:27, Warin wrote: The only problem is the 'ton'. I n the USA 2,000 pounds In the UK 2,240 pounds. Resolving this? units 'ton us' and 'ton uk' ??? I've been converting to pounds (lbs), which avoids this ambiguity with precise

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

On 31/01/19 08:41, s8evq wrote: Hello everyone, I'm a relative new contributor and have a question about tagging "club=scout" and "club=youth". What about similar organisations than Scouts? This might not exists as much in other countries, but here in Belgium we have KSA, KLJ, Chiro and

Re: [Tagging] weight limit in short tons

On 2019-01-26 15:27, Warin wrote: The only problem is the 'ton'. I n the USA 2,000 pounds In the UK 2,240 pounds. Resolving this? units 'ton us' and 'ton uk' ??? I've been converting to pounds (lbs), which avoids this ambiguity with precise conversions. Apparently I'm not alone. [1] But

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

On 30.01.2019 22:41, s8evq wrote: 2) According to the wiki there's also club=youth, but it's not used and amenity=community_centre should be used instead. Reading the wiki on amenity=community_centre (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dcommunity_centre#Differentiation): "When

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

Le 30.01.19 à 23:02, Warin a écrit : > On 31/01/19 08:41, s8evq wrote: >> I'm a relative new contributor welcome. >> "club=scout" and "club=youth". >> What about similar organisations than Scouts? This might not exists as >> much in other countries, but here in Belgium we have KSA, KLJ, Chiro

[Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

Hello everyone, I'm a relative new contributor and have a question about tagging "club=scout" and "club=youth". What about similar organisations than Scouts? This might not exists as much in other countries, but here in Belgium we have KSA, KLJ, Chiro and Scouts (and a whole bunch more).

[Tagging] Tagging "test preperation" / cram school / Juku (eg: Komon)

Looking over the page for schools and all the abandoned proposals, I assume there is some in-use tag for after-school study and test preparation type private “schools” In the US, besides chain shops like Komon, there are “SAT Test preparation” places to help high school students study for

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There are, or were 'cubs' for the younger people, 'rovers' for the older > people, guides for the girls yea - Brownies, Wheblos, Venture scouts, etc. There are tons of them just for Boy & Girl scouts. the

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

> On Jan 31, 2019, at 8:15 AM, marc marc wrote: > > Scouts and scout do maybe not have the same meaning in belgium. > I understand club=scout (without a ending S and without an upercase) > as the "generic" term for any scout-like club +1 Similar to how brand names become the name for things

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

On 31/01/19 11:33, John Willis via Tagging wrote: On Jan 31, 2019, at 8:15 AM, marc marc > wrote: Scouts and scout do maybe not have the same meaning in belgium. I understand club=scout (without a ending S and without an upercase) as the "generic" term for

Re: [Tagging] club=scout for similar organisations

On 31/01/19 13:02, John Willis via Tagging wrote: On Jan 31, 2019, at 10:17 AM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: There are, or were 'cubs' for the younger people, 'rovers' for the older people, guides for the girls yea - Brownies, Wheblos, Venture