Florimond Berthoux :
> No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you
> thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway
> together because it's the same layout, the same problem.
>
Ok, my bad. Separate tagging for continuous sidewalk and continuous
Florimond,
already in your otherwise interesting map that you presented in Heidelberg,
you do not consider all categories:
1) sidewalk
2) cycleway
3) combined foot-cycleway (as sidewalk)
4) segregated foot-cycleway (as sidewalk; with separate lanes for
pedestrians and bicycles)
Volker
On Sat,
No, I'm not talking about cycling on a sidewalk (I don't know why you
thought that ??), I discuss continuous sidewalk and continuous cycleway
together because it's the same layout, the same problem.
And I'm doing that because I'm interesting in cycling infrastructure more
than others.
For instance
sent from a phone
> On 25. Jan 2020, at 15:19, Peter Elderson wrote:
>
> Well, any crossing involves different ways crossing each other, and should be
> considered from all angles involved. A way can't cross another way without
> being crossed itself.
the question is which way is
Ah, I see. You are talking about cycling on the sidewalk. Indeed, very
unusual in Nederland. To me it's strange to tag continuous_sidewalk mainly
for cycling.
You talk of junction=continuous_sidewalk, I see no reason to even consider
that.
If you have a cycleway, footway or footcycleway around a
Le sam. 25 janv. 2020 à 15:19, Peter Elderson a
écrit :
> Florimond Berthoux :
>
>> With a table the pedestrians have to cross the road, it is the opposite
>> for the continuous sidewalk that's why I'm in favor to add a new value
>>
> traffic_calming=continuous_sidewalk
>>
>
> Well, any crossing
Florimond Berthoux :
> With a table the pedestrians have to cross the road, it is the opposite
> for the continuous sidewalk that's why I'm in favor to add a new value
>
traffic_calming=continuous_sidewalk
>
Well, any crossing involves different ways crossing each other, and should
be considered
Give ways:
> If there is traffic sign or painting you can add a give way tag.
> If there is none, you cannot add a give way, or you would interpret the
> law which is not on the ground.
>
We have many situations of legal restrictions that we express by tagging,
even though there are no explicit
Looks like a good idea - moved
Jan 24, 2020, 18:33 by derickso...@gmail.com:
> Rather than "Mismatching key names", what about "Counterintuitive key names"?
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:20 AM Volker Schmidt <> vosc...@gmail.com> > wrote:
>
>> OK,
>> my wording was intentionally provoking. But
HI all,
According to practices and vocabulary, amenity=charging_station is mostly
used on nodes and have chances to refer to devices.
Even on situations with one single socket, the place has to include space
required to park vehicles while charging. Then it's preferable to map
places as polygons
On Saturday, 25 January 2020, Thibault Molleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2018 all countries in the European Union were forced to switch
> their naming scheme for fuels at gas stations to the new E5/E10/B7 scheme
> (referring to the amount of bio-ethanol in the fuel.
>
> Sources:
>
On Saturday, 25 January 2020, Thibault Molleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Back in 2018 all countries in the European Union were forced to switch
> their naming scheme for fuels at gas stations to the new E5/E10/B7 scheme
> (referring to the amount of bio-ethanol in the fuel.
>
> Sources:
>
I would welcome a section on the wiki page about the EU coding scheme, but
I draw the opposite conclusion to the original poster: existing tag value
counts show that the community are very clearly against using EU fuel codes
in the EU; the current tag values can be/are used worldwide; therefore
Hello,
Same in France, fuel stations have to display new naming (and most do),
but old names "SP95", "SP95-E10", "SP98" and "Diesel" are still shown
and will stay for many years at least.
Regards,
Adrien P.
Le 25/01/2020 à 09:38, Frederik Ramm a écrit :
Hi,
On 1/25/20 08:26, Thibault
Hi,
On 1/25/20 08:26, Thibault Molleman wrote:
> Back in 2018 all countries in the European Union were forced to switch
> their naming scheme
That may well be but the fuel stations in my vicinity still advertise
"Diesel" and not "e10", so at least for the part of Germany where I
live, "fuel:b7"
15 matches
Mail list logo
