Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Paul Johnson
On 11/03/2010 01:39 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should > be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times > more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database. I don't think it's a common agreement b

Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Noel David Torres Taño
On Miércoles 03 Noviembre 2010 19:14:45 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer escribió: > 2010/11/3 Tobias Knerr : > > M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > >> The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should > >> be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times > >> more often (26

Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/11/3 Tobias Knerr : > M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should >> be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times >> more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database. > > "website" is intended for "the

Re: [Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread Tobias Knerr
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should > be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times > more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database. "website" is intended for "the official website for a feature".

[Tagging] url vs. website

2010-11-03 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
The mapfeatures declare that url should not be used and website should be used instead. Is this a common agreement? I find url used 3,5 times more often (260 000) then website (66 800) in the database. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@ope