On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 01:09, Dave F. wrote:
> Guessing has no place in OSM.
What about smoothness? tracktype? (operator for that matter? how many
checks official company papers?)
> Please take advice from the vast majority of repliers & drop this proposal.
I'm taking slowly, but still got posi
On 01/04/2011 23:46, Peter Gervai wrote:
I like "unofficial", and "unauthorised" (sp :)) even more. I'll update
the wiki page.
But, related to your original proposal, that's still subjective guess work.
Guessing has no place in OSM.
Please take advice from the vast majority of repliers & drop
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 15:45, McGuire, Matthew
wrote:
>>>Serge> 2. Carries a lot of weight. It's a serious thing to accuse
>>>Serge> someone/something of being illegal.
>
>>Peter>I disagree, please help to find a different word then.
> How about, "de facto", "unofficial", "unauthorized" or "info
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/directional
Some things to note
- This does not redefine the existing convention of waterways flowing in the
direction of the way.
- directional=-1 is included for completeness, I do not expect it to be used
frequently.
- Unknown values shoul
Well, what I was thinking (but didn't express clearly) was that whether you see
a reversal, or merely a slowing, would depend upon where in the estuary you
measured the flow. Thanks for the clarification on the tidal bore terminology..
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Any sup
On 01/04/2011 17:47, j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One example of a waterway with reversing flow would be the estuary of a river.
While the tide is rising, the flow in the estuary may slow, come to a
standstill, or even temporarily reverse directions (called a tidal bore).
Surely most estuaries r
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:55:06 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> So looking at wikipedia also for lake I found that basically the main
> difference between the two is the size but also, how deep it is. If it
were
> only the size this tag would not be needed, because unless you draw lakes
> as sin
2011/4/1
> One example of a waterway with reversing flow would be the estuary of a
> river. While the tide is rising, the flow in the estuary may slow, come to
> a standstill, or even temporarily reverse directions (called a tidal bore).
>
>
Yes, but they are not covered by current proposed wat
2011/4/1 Ilya Zverev
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:35:37 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
> >> what natural=water on an area means. Is this area a lake, a pond? We
> have
> >> no means to determine that now.
> >
> > could you expand what a "pond" is? I get several translations for this,
> > ran
One example of a waterway with reversing flow would be the estuary of a river.
While the tide is rising, the flow in the estuary may slow, come to a
standstill, or even temporarily reverse directions (called a tidal bore).
---Original Email---
Subject :Re: [Tagging] Any support for a fl
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011 17:35:37 +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>> what natural=water on an area means. Is this area a lake, a pond? We
have
>> no means to determine that now.
>
> could you expand what a "pond" is? I get several translations for this,
> ranging from natural to artificial bodies o
On 4/1/2011 11:40 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
OK, interesting case, what do you propose for the conditional tagging?
Do you have specifics how much is "high water"?
Most likely the water management district decides on a case-by-case
basis. I would guess that there are also waterways with no "
On 4/1/2011 11:35 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
(not sure if "fountain" applies to the kind of
big flat water areas you can typically find in front of castles which
are positioned there to reflect the castle?)
Those are called reflecting pools.
___
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II
> On 4/1/2011 11:24 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> like an overfall).
>> if I get this right (sounds
>>
>
> No, it's the same canal, with water flowing the other direction. This is
> the S-58 structure: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?node=944499871 There is
> normal
2011/4/1 Ilya Zverev
> what natural=water on an area means. Is this area a lake, a pond? We have
> no means to determine that now.
>
>
could you expand what a "pond" is? I get several translations for this,
ranging from natural to artificial bodies of water. How do you suggest would
a large foun
On 4/1/2011 11:24 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>>
http://my.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xrepository/sfwmd_repository_pdf/lake_management_area_descriptions.pdf
"The smaller S-58 water control structure located at the north end
of
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II
> On 4/1/2011 10:38 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> Yes of course. I set FIXME=please check flow direction if I am unsure
>> (usually you can deduct the flow direction but there is rare cases where
>> it is not possible).
>>
> With manmade channels it's far from rare
On 4/1/2011 10:38 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Yes of course. I set FIXME=please check flow direction if I am unsure
(usually you can deduct the flow direction but there is rare cases where
it is not possible).
With manmade channels it's far from rare. Example:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?wa
Dave F. wrote:
> Aren't most of these in use already?
> "water=river A body of river, which is currently mapped as
> waterway=riverbank."
> You seem to be unaware of waterway=river. Please refer to his for a
> complete tagging guide:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:waterway%3Dri
2011/4/1 Nathan Edgars II
> On 4/1/2011 9:53 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>
>> flow of waterways in mapnik would help to fix those errors, because more
>> people would become aware.
>> mapping error. What if a coastline is drawn the other way? Rendering the
>>
>
> Still doesn't deal with unknow
On 01/04/2011 05:30, Ilya Zverev wrote:
Hi.
At some point we've been fed up with fixing name=Pond and such, so I guess
it's time to be more specific about what natural=water is. I suggest a new
detail tag, water=*. It's pretty straightforward, but there are some
deprecations (which at this point
On 4/1/2011 9:53 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/3/31 Lennard mailto:l...@xs4all.nl>>
If the direction of the way is drawn in the same flow of the water, it
should always be drawn with an arrow.
What if it's drawn the other way?
mapping error. What if a coastline is draw
2011/3/31 Lennard
> If the direction of the way is drawn in the same flow of the water, it
>
>> should always be drawn with an arrow.
>>
>
> What if it's drawn the other way?
>
>
mapping error. What if a coastline is drawn the other way? Rendering the
flow of waterways in mapnik would help to fi
>On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:56:50 +200 Peter Gervai wrote:
>>On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 13:56, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>Serge> 2. Carries a lot of weight. It's a serious thing to accuse
>>Serge> someone/something of being illegal.
>Peter>I disagree, please help to find a different word then.
How
On 01/04/2011 13:42, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/1 Ulf Lamping:
Excellent example of wiki fiddling ...
at least this was discussed and voted about:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/generator_rationalisation
But not greatly used:
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/Plane
2011/4/1 Ulf Lamping :
> Am 27.03.2011 12:24, schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
>>
>> Following recent international events, i start study nuclear site on
>> OSM.
>>
>> Nuclear power plant seems presents and use
>> power=generator
>> power_source=nuclear
>> power_rating=2000 MW
>
We've agreed in the spanish list to add the network tag to the ATM, so if
there is no discussion against here, I will add that to the wiki.
Noel
er Envite
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tag
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 13:56, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Peter> First, it's not simple and measurable, at least I really wonder how
> Peter> many of us measured an incline which isn't signed (I have tried, takes
> Peter> time and a bit of math, and I don't even play it for most of the
> Peter> ca
Am 27.03.2011 12:24, schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
Following recent international events, i start study nuclear site on
OSM.
Nuclear power plant seems presents and use
power=generator
power_source=nuclear
power_rating=2000 MW
but according to wiki, this was obsolete and
29 matches
Mail list logo
