Am 03.04.2011 04:26, schrieb David Murn:
On Sat, 2011-04-02 at 12:11 +0200, Ulf Lamping wrote:
*... and I'll especially call it wiki fiddling if the currently widely
used tags are removed from the wiki without even keeping a note of the
old tags.*
Doesnt the fact that the proposal exists,
Hello Ed,
On Sat, 2 Apr 2011 22:26:22 -0400, Ed Hillsman wrote:
The discussion of the sidewalk issue seems to have stopped. I added
some comments in the discussion section of the wiki last week, but
there have been no further comments there or here in nearly a week.
I saw your comments
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
There are lots of tags that are direction dependant:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent
It does seem like josm handles many of those in a good way, not all by
far though.
there is also highway=steps which I
2011/4/2 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Tracktype is verifiable against a visual scale:
http://wiki.openstreetmcan't
givap.org/wiki/Tracktypehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tracktype
but as it depends much on the climate and surface material / vegatation /
ground it still has to be
On 4/3/2011 4:43 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/4/2 Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com mailto:erjo...@gmail.com
There are lots of tags that are direction dependant:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Category:Way_Direction_Dependent
It does seem like josm handles many of those
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
There you can use incline=* to be explicit.
Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no incline
proposal, and later I found it sufficient to keep the implicit information.
Nobody used to draw plans would draw steps
Hi.
There are two things I would like to make additions to.
1) separate or tag-scheme (the long discussion in general):
I'm one of the people who think, both should be used on a
case-by-case-basis.
Working on a map- and routing-portal for blind people (therefore most
likely a special case of
Am 03.04.2011 11:52, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
2011/4/3 Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com mailto:nerou...@gmail.com
There you can use incline=* to be explicit.
Yes, I know, but when I started mapping back in 2/2008 there was no
incline proposal, and later I found it sufficient to
* Ed Hillsman ehills...@tampabay.rr.com [2011-04-02 22:26 -0400]:
With regard to routing, sidewalks on college campuses, in parks, and
in cemeteries may be interior to a large area bounded by streets,
and as a result some may not have an associated street to use for a
name.
I don't think
On 4/3/2011 9:38 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Ed Hillsmanehills...@tampabay.rr.com [2011-04-02 22:26 -0400]:
Would it work to add a tag associated_street and then simply list the
name of the street? For example, highway=footway,
associated_street=East Fowler Avenue.
This might not be a bad idea.
On 31.03.2011 10:41, Dominik Mahrer (Teddy) wrote:
Hi
Voting is open for public transport proposal:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Public_Transport
1. In the provided links I can see all the street names in German. Do
you have any examples of uses outside of the German
On Sun, 03 Apr 2011 10:49:18 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 4/3/2011 9:38 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Ed Hillsmanehills...@tampabay.rr.com
[2011-04-02 22:26 -0400]:
Would it work to add a tag associated_street and then simply list the
name of the street? For example, highway=footway,
12 matches
Mail list logo
