On 06/30/2011 05:35 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
> How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
> thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
> or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
>
> http://www.ingalcivil.com.au/reboundable_lane_divider.ht
On 6/30/11 9:06 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
This may be a factor of how low off the ground the bottom row of cables are
located. Here in Tennessee, solid guardrails are mostly used. Cable barriers,
when used, tend to have the bottom cable about the same distance off of the
ground as the bot
aul Johnson wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 02:50 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> > Paul Johnson wrote:
> >
> >> On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >>> Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
> >>> barrier values.
> >>>
> >>> Please comment now on this, befor
How about lane dividers? This is an example below, though where I'm
thinking of them they actually divide a couple of lanes for about a km
or so - no lane changing allowed at that point.
http://www.ingalcivil.com.au/reboundable_lane_divider.html
Stephen
On 1 July 2011 03:37, M∡rtin Koppenhoefe
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:41 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2011/6/30 Eugene Alvin Villar :
>> Yes and no. It's true that we use underscores simply because we
>> substitute spaces with underscores. But there's actually a precedent
>> for substituting an underscore for a hyphen and this is the ta
On 06/30/2011 02:50 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
> Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>> On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>> Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
>>> barrier values.
>>>
>>> Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get
>> this
On 6/30/2011 1:37 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_t
On 6/30/2011 7:13 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/6/30 Paul Johnson:
The rope barrier pictured is actually a crash fence commonly used as a
cost saving measure on motorway medians in the US.
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next days. I guess the t
2011/6/30 Paul Johnson :
> The rope barrier pictured is actually a crash fence commonly used as a
> cost saving measure on motorway medians in the US.
thank you for this comment Paul. I overlooked this and will change it
the next days. I guess the thing on the pic is a kind of guard_rail
(probabl
Paul Johnson wrote:
> On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> > Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
> > barrier values.
> >
> > Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get
> this
> > to a more definite status:
> >
> >
> http://wik
On 06/30/2011 10:37 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
> barrier values.
>
> Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
> to a more definite status:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features
2011/6/30 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> Yes and no. It's true that we use underscores simply because we
> substitute spaces with underscores. But there's actually a precedent
> for substituting an underscore for a hyphen and this is the tag for
> specifying power sub-stations (created back in 2007):
> ht
Folk, I rediscovered an old proposal which is extending the set of
barrier values.
Please comment now on this, before we can eventually vote to get this
to a more definite status:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
Cheers,
Martin
_
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 12:41 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
>> and also that there's
>> a strong preference for underscores (In fact, there is no hyphenated
>> key or value in the Map Features page).
>
> I think that this is a misconception. Usually we use the underscore in
> keys and formal value
2011/6/30 Eugene Alvin Villar :
> In April 2010, I first suggested having another value (namely,
> service=drive_thru) for the service=* tag for drive-through lanes
> similar to service=parking_aisle:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/2010-April/001710.html
> Based on the response
Thanks for the summary, and for your efforts submitting patches. I'm all for
drive_through; even if drive-through is the more "correct" term, an
underscore is better for the reasons you've outlined.
Thanks,
-Josh
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Eugene Alvin Villar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
>
Hello everyone,
Here's some additional context and history to frame the discussion:
In April 2010, I first suggested having another value (namely,
service=drive_thru) for the service=* tag for drive-through lanes
similar to service=parking_aisle:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/tagging/
17 matches
Mail list logo
