Martijn van Exel m at rtijn.org writes:
Linked data is not about linking to every possible source from one
source, but rather publishing your data as RDF thus allowing linkages
with other datasets. See here[1].
I don't think it gets much attention in the OSM community, and I don't
claim to
I would love to see a bot run after the database officially was declared odbl
to delete them and the odbl:note tags. ___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Hi,
On 07/27/2012 09:14 AM, Alan Mintz wrote:
Now that the redaction is finished, is there a need to keep any odbl=clean
tags, or does it make sense to remove them if making other edits to objects.
I think they can be phased out in this way. They're not needed any
more. They should be
Apart from the legal aspects, which exclude it anyway, I find it completely
wrong to copy data statically into OSM that is by definition variable
(TripAdvisor awards are automatically generated data from user input).
Such data should not be inserted into the OSM database.
A similar argument goes
Am 26.07.2012 um 23:29 schrieb Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net:
I suggest award:Award_System=Award
+1
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park8
amenity=trailer_park23
tourism=camp_site 40196
WernerP
[1]
At 2012-07-27 00:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
But of course we weren't talking about the photo per se, but about the
question whether you could put the rating in the OSM database, and I
believe that even if the Michelin rating is displayed in a way so artful
that it attracts copyright, the *fact*
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to be
not quite correct IMHO.
tourism=camp_site with the caravans=yes is
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:54 AM, Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to be
not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park8
I'd agree, it definitely doesn't look like a trailer park or camp site.
Landuse=residential would cover it without you having to get into
wordsmithing. There was some discussion on extending landuse=residential
with residential=* tags:
Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu writes:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged
landuse=trailer_park. Is that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag
tourism=camp_site seems to be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park 8
amenity=trailer_park 23
tourism=camp_site
At 2012-07-27 06:54, Werner Poppele wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park8
amenity=trailer_park23
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 08:28 -0700, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-07-27 06:54, Werner Poppele wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park. Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
In the US (context established in first post), trailer park nearly always
refers to a residential subdivision where people buy small lots, and then
place mobile homes on those lots for permanent residence. I would suggest
tagging the area with landuse=residential, and possibly some kind of
Werner Poppele popp...@hm.edu wrote:
In the US [1] I found some trailer parks tagged landuse=trailer_park.
Is
that ok ? Any other recommendations ? The tag tourism=camp_site seems
to
be not quite correct IMHO.
taginfo
landuse=trailer_park 8
amenity=trailer_park 23
tourism=camp_site
At 2012-07-27 15:23, Pieren wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
Just to be clear, this is exactly the case I envision, and something our
crowd-source model should be good at - people seeing/knowing from local
knowledge that a restaurant has a
16 matches
Mail list logo