Re: [Tagging] on the name of a tag for landcover

2012/8/3 Martin Vonwald : > Am 03.08.2012 um 15:33 schrieb Johan Jönsson : > >> It is the third value in the series trees/shrubs/?? I am looking for. > > In this context I would like to ask all native speakers: what is a shrub? > What is a bush (not George)? What is used in common language? > Wel

Re: [Tagging] Bench as way. Was : Tagging amenity=waste_basket

On 05.08.2012 11:49, Vincent Pottier wrote: > Le 05/08/2012 09:56, Tobias Knerr a écrit : >> As far as I know, though, there is no obvious or even documented >> convention on what side of the way the backrest would be? >> > It could be : backrest=left|right|none|middle backrest=yes/no has been p

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

That makes sense, especially if there already is backrest=left|right|middle|none. LM 2012/8/5 Peter Wendorff : > Am 05.08.2012 18:10, schrieb LM_1: > >> For direction of the benches mapped as ways I would use analogous* >> rule to cliffs and retaining walls, that is: If you hold the bench >> with

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

Am 05.08.2012 18:10, schrieb LM_1: For direction of the benches mapped as ways I would use analogous* rule to cliffs and retaining walls, that is: If you hold the bench with left hand (from the sitting side) you are looking in the same direction as the way. In other words backrest on left side of

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

For direction of the benches mapped as ways I would use analogous* rule to cliffs and retaining walls, that is: If you hold the bench with left hand (from the sitting side) you are looking in the same direction as the way. In other words backrest on left side of the way, sitting side on right side

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

Gary Gallagher wrote: I certainly think amenity bench should be altered to it to be tagged as a way. A couple of times I've come across very long bench structures built a long walls or doubling as long fence structures. Gary On Aug 5, 2012 9:21 AM, "Komяpa" > wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Bench as way. Was : Tagging amenity=waste_basket

On 2012-08-05 11:49,  Vincent Pottier wrote : But in my dictionnay, for the French "dossier", I find "back". No backrest. GoogleMaps, despite starting to be funny as soon as you put two words side by side, is often very interesting for a single one:

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 17:36 +, Johan Jönsson wrote: > > That area is extremly thoroughly micromapped and things normally a node could > be represented by an area. > Interesting to look at, as you say "extremely thoroughly micro mapped", but I was intrigued by the trees in the middle of a way.

Re: [Tagging] Bench as way. Was : Tagging amenity=waste_basket

Le 05/08/2012 11:49, Vincent Pottier a écrit : But in my dictionnay, for the French "dossier", I find "back". No backrest. Backrest seems to be correct : "the back piece of a chair, used to support the sitter's back" [1]. [1] http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/backrest

Re: [Tagging] Bench as way. Was : Tagging amenity=waste_basket

Le 05/08/2012 09:56, Tobias Knerr a écrit : The particular bench in your example could also be modelled as a node with direction and width tags. Nevertheless, one could argue that long benches like this one http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Universitaet_Passau_09.jpg would best be mapped as

Re: [Tagging] Tagging amenity=waste_basket

Komяpa wrote: > >> PS: Same with amenity=bench [2] > > I found linear amenity=bench quite useful for micromappning and 2.5D > rendering: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Kothic-metrics6.png The particular bench in your example could also be modelled as a node with direction and width