On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> There is really no point in grouping
> different kinds of edits in the same set of changes, just because you
> happen to do them at the same time.
Really ?!
Sometimes, I miss the "open" of OpenStreetMap...
Pieren
_
(I am replying to the message which appears last in the longest stack in the
web listing)
Thanks, everyone, for your thoughts.
I gave this some additional thought over the past day. My initial concern was
from a provenance point-of-view; I work with semantic web technologies inside a
corporat
Philip Barnes wrote:
> In the UK many premiere inns are converted office buildings.
>
> How does one go about mapping a row of terraced houses, where a single
> building will contain 20 our so houses, often with a corner shop at
> the end? I would have drawn each house to maintain numbering, is
I've not used this but if you're using JOSM this plugin might help.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/JOSM/Plugins/Terracer
Dudley
From: p...@trigpoint.me.uk
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
CC:
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2013 10:25:47 +
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Multiple purposes for buildings
In the
2013/1/2 Serge Wroclawski :
> On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
Secondly, any changeset can have multiple sources so adding the source tag
to a changeset is not flexible enough.
>>>
>>> We use semicolons for all tags as a separator.
>>
>> But it's less precise
>
> Then
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
There are many people (myself included) who believe that source /on
objects/ is not useful, and most OSMers have moved away from using it,
and toward source on changesets.
[citation needed]
So then what do we do? We could have a source tag for every tag...
source:cuis
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
>>> Secondly, any changeset can have multiple sources so adding the source tag
>>> to a changeset is not flexible enough.
>>
>> We use semicolons for all tags as a separator.
>
> But it's less precise
Then you'd make a new changeset. It's the s
>> Secondly, any changeset can have multiple sources so adding the source tag
>> to a changeset is not flexible enough.
>
> We use semicolons for all tags as a separator.
But it's less precise. Recently I had made a survey, and one of the
things I found was a new road. So I added that. Close to it
Hi All, I choose not to make them as multipolygon, but drew the condo's ontop.
> To: "Tag discussion, strategy and related tools"
>
> Subject: [Tagging] Multiple purposes for buildings
Maybe a bit late, I
struggled with this building some time ago and even asked around. But after
this t
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:16 AM, Chris Hill wrote:
> On 02/01/13 12:50, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
> Whoever told you that is wrong, not that that is unusual on mailing lists.
There are many people (myself included) who believe that source /on
objects/ is not useful, and most OSMers have moved
On 02/01/2013 12:50, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I have been told ( on the talk-US email list ) that use of {{key|source}} on
objects has been deprecated for years and that such information is only of
historical interest and its use should be restricted to changesets. This is
not reflected i
On 02/01/13 12:50, dies38...@mypacks.net wrote:
I have been told ( on the talk-US email list ) that use of {{key|source}} on
objects has been deprecated for years and that such information is only of
historical interest and its use should be restricted to changesets. This is
not reflected in
> I have been told ( on the talk-US email list ) that use of
> {{key|source}} on objects has been deprecated for years and that
> such information is only of historical interest and its use should
> be restricted to changesets. This is not reflected in anything I
> can find on the wiki, and I've d
I have been told ( on the talk-US email list ) that use of {{key|source}} on
objects has been deprecated for years and that such information is only of
historical interest and its use should be restricted to changesets. This is
not reflected in anything I can find on the wiki, and I've done an
I have been told ( on the talk-US email list ) that use of {{key|source}} on objects has been deprecated for years and that such information is only of historical interest and its use should be restricted to changesets. This is not reflected in anything I can find on the wiki, and I've done an inc
2013/1/2 Philip Barnes :
> In the UK many premiere inns are converted office buildings.
yes, offices don't have a lot of requirements, also depending on the
intended standard (e.g. if you need air conditioning but you don't
want to see it, and a certain floor height, you might get problems,
but i
In the UK many premiere inns are converted office buildings.
How does one go about mapping a row of terraced houses, where a single
building will contain 20 our so houses, often with a corner shop at the end? I
would have drawn each house to maintain numbering, is that the correct way?
Phil
--
2013/1/2 Martin Koppenhoefer
> 2013/1/2 Simone Saviolo :
> > What you are trying to tag is the
> > *use* of the building, and not a property of the building per se. Unless
> > it's a mall, a retail store's interior is not structurally different
> from an
> > office space or apartments - it could
2013/1/2 Simone Saviolo :
> IMO, the question is conceptually wrong.
+1
> What you are trying to tag is the
> *use* of the building, and not a property of the building per se. Unless
> it's a mall, a retail store's interior is not structurally different from an
> office space or apartments - it
2013/1/1 Svavar Kjarrval :
> How does one tag buildings which are both commercial and residential?
> There are two main situations I'm thinking of:
> 1) The part which is residential is besides the part which is
> commercial, but they do have the same housenumber. Do I separate the
> commercial par
2013/1/1 Svavar Kjarrval
> That's, of course, possible. The question was what value should be in the
> building tag in the building polygon. Of course I'd like to implement the
> level of detail you suggest but it doesn't answer the original question.
>
IMO, the question is conceptually wrong.
21 matches
Mail list logo
