Hi,
I'm pleased to announce the voting of power generation refinement proposal.
It takes place until June 10.
Please use the dedicated wiki page to place your vote.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Power_generation_refinement
Many thanks in advance to take a little time to p
Hi,
On 05/27/2013 03:38 PM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
For syntactic changes such as typo fixes, I do not consider
it necessary to gather on-the-ground evidence, because you are not
changing what the data says about the situation on the ground (the
semantics). Instead, your responsibility is to check t
I was going to enter a long rambling rant about this subject against the
anti-"mechanical edits" gang (part of the anti-import and anti-aerial
imagery groups)it seems like some of them just like bad data and no
standards.
But a simple +1 to Tobias' comments. Crazy guidelines in the Mechanical
On 27.05.2013 10:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> Most "cleaners" become greedy with time. They start fixing a few typos
> in their local area and before too long they make overpass queries and
> fix "typos" world-wide without even thinking that the tag might indeed
> be used differently in other places.
2013/5/27 hannes.janet...@gmail.com
> To clarify, my commit message was probably not correctly worded. The
> change was for features that contained *both* landuse=recreation_ground and
> leisure=recreation_ground. Having recreation_ground twice with one tag
> documented (proposed and accepted) an
2013/5/27
> changing from undocumented to documented.
>
IMHO problematic because if a tag isn't documented how would you know what
its intended meaning is?
>
> changing from uncommon to significant weight in taginfo
>
fine when there is docu for both tags and they have the same meaning
On 27/mag/2013, at 01:25, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> I also want to point out that Hannes is not "running a bot". He is,
> apparently, simply using JOSM.
...which he uses for manual huge scale edits, so the mechanical edits
guidelines do apply anyway. See here for more info:
http://wiki.openstreetma
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 1:29 PM, wrote:
>
> Tobias Knerr writes:
>
> > On 27.05.2013 00:47, Greg Troxel wrote:
> >>
> >> Hannes writes:
> >>> Sorry, I was not aware of that policy. I will discuss such edits in
> future.
> >>> Please revert if they are unreasonable
> >>
> >> You should revert th
Tobias Knerr writes:
> On 27.05.2013 00:47, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>
>> Hannes writes:
>>> Sorry, I was not aware of that policy. I will discuss such edits in future.
>>> Please revert if they are unreasonable
>>
>> You should revert them yourself. If you aren't comfortable doing
>> reverts, yo
On 27/mag/2013, at 01:25, Tobias Knerr wrote:
> Without patient contributors silently
> performing routine housekeeping like that, our database would be even
> more messy than it already is.
Who knows, I already experienced in the past information loss because of people
uniforming some of
Hi,
On 05/27/2013 01:25 AM, Tobias Knerr wrote:
But with the other changes, things are different. I believe that
changing a handful instances of an undocumented tag to an obviously
synonymous tag that *is* documented and much more widely used (e.g.
1000x in the case of village green) is valuable
11 matches
Mail list logo
