On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 1:15 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
> >> access=permissive (while nominally private, no visible attempt is made
> >> to restrict access, and casual use appears to be tolerated by the
> >> owners).
> >> access=inqui
Sometimes a lot's address (for tax purposes) is different from the building
address (which may be driven by a desire to be on a more 'popular' street
name).
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 11:04 +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Another object that comes to my mind is amenity=pub. You will usually
> get something to eat in a pub in the UK, but you won't in many German
> "amenity=pub" (indeed it might have been a good idea to invent
> something dedicated for
2013/7/19 Elliott Plack
> For example: a vacant lot often has an address, but there doesn't need to
> be a building there.
> Also some shopping centers have multiple addresses for the same building,
> so we make address points for each entrance or centroid.
>
yes, this is both because addresse
I like the address as a feature approach because not all addressed 'things'
exist, and 'things' can have many addresses. That's how we deal with addresses
in my gov's GIS.
For example: a vacant lot often has an address, but there doesn't need to be a
building there.
Also some shopping centers
2013/7/19 Eugene Alvin Villar
>
> 1. Are addresses features as Pieren suggests? Thus addresses should be
>> mapped separately or at least tagged singularly on the primary object that
>> represents the address.
>>
> 2. Or are addresses attributes (like names) of POIs, buildings, and the
> like? In
<>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Pieren wrote:
> Not for me. I think the address is a "feature" by ifself, not an
> attribute of other features (like 'name').
>
I want to know what do people think about addresses.
1. Are addresses features as Pieren suggests? Thus addresses should be
mapped
Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German
> origin, my question is what the British definition of the word is,
> since it's British English that we use in OSM as our base language,
> and does that British definition differ from the US definition.
"
On 19/07/2013 12:50, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
As for kindergarten, while the name may have an obvious German origin,
my question is what the British definition of the word is, since it's
British English that we use in OSM as our base language, and does that
British definition differ from the US
On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 3:15 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>>
>>> Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
>>> preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to
>>> have
>>> to parse the location first a
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:57 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> Example use case: a corporate campus with multiple buildings,
> but a single postal address.
Either your corporate campus is a single polygone (containing the
buildings), then put the address on this polygon. Or the campus is a
spread and y
2013/7/19 Pieren
> For addresses, most of them have a simple 1:1
> relationship with a building (probable not in urban areas).
>
This really depends on the area, in some German regions the address is for
a site, and ("if needed") for entrances to buildings or staircases on that
site, this means
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Serge Wroclawski
> That seems okay to me.
Not for me. I think the address is a "feature" by ifself, not an
attribute of other features (like 'name'). For instance, a routing
software cares about a unique address when only the address is
provided. In this case, it
2013/7/19 Frederik Ramm
> On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>>
>> We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could use
>> worldwide for pretty much everything else, including roads, sports,
>> other schools, various amenities, etc.
>>
>
> Have we really?
>
> In Italy (and
Hi,
On 07/19/2013 03:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Of the solutions, I feel that calling it what it's called locally is
preferable. Anyone who cares to compare across countries is going to have
to parse the location first anyway.
We've managed to handle creating definitions that we could use
15 matches
Mail list logo