[Tagging] historic=vicarage

2013-08-01 Thread Marc Gemis
I'm currently mapping the protected monuments in Belgium. One of the buildings you encounter are vicarages. I looked at taginfo, but couldn't find an appropriate tag. What should I use ? historic = vicarage or parsonage or rectory or presbytery ? It's for roman-catholic pastors in case that mat

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Substation Refinement

2013-08-01 Thread Ole Nielsen
The proposal is more or less ready. No recent comments to the proposal. However, we are in the middle of the holiday season and I don't think it would be a good idea to call for a vote before late August or so. On 01/08/2013 01:31, François Lacombe wrote: Hi, It seems there hasn't been so many

Re: [Tagging] one way part of the year

2013-08-01 Thread fly
On 01.08.2013 18:32, William Rieck wrote: Hey doug > A route relation would work, in which you could specify the direction. A relation is usually used for each signed route but not just for the piste. > On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, doug brown > wrote: > >

Re: [Tagging] amenity=police

2013-08-01 Thread Clifford Snow
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:23 PM, Toby Murray wrote: > We were just discussing the amenity tag in #osm. If we are inventing a new > tag, can we avoid using amenity? Whatever a ranger station is, it is not an > "amenity" and I would like to stop the spread of this woefully overloaded > tag. It may

Re: [Tagging] one way part of the year

2013-08-01 Thread William Rieck
A route relation would work, in which you could specify the direction. On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 10:59 AM, doug brown wrote: > I do not understand the notation that has been used in these replies. for > example, piste:type=nordic contains three elements, and tags have only two > elements: key and

Re: [Tagging] one way part of the year

2013-08-01 Thread doug brown
I do not understand the notation that has been used in these replies. for example, piste:type=nordic contains three elements, and tags have only two elements: key and value. I would appreciate some carification on this notation. Also, to further clarify my question, I am tagging the park trai

Re: [Tagging] access at own risk

2013-08-01 Thread Greg Troxel
"John F. Eldredge" writes: > On the other hand, a road labeled as "use at your own risk" may well > be one that is not currently being maintained, meaning that you have > increased odds of finding it impassable due to washouts, landslides, > and the like. I have seen some one-lane tracks where