Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Bicycle=use_cycleway

As far as I know it is not common to change the wiki while voting. I want to change many things but I understand why it is not fair to change while voting. Today I noticed that user Emkey08 added info to wiki (Rationale routing) . Is this OK? Cheers PeeWee32 2013/12/2 Jonathan > Thankfully I d

Re: [Tagging] noexit

Or possibly somebody changed the meaning of the tag on the wiki, without telling dinosaurs like myself. At first it was a tag that went on ways which are a dead end for cars. It got an icon in JOSM when put on nodes and people started using it on end nodes. Op 3 dec. 2013 15:28 schreef "Mike N" :

Re: [Tagging] noexit

Am 03.12.2013 14:48, schrieb André Pirard: I agree to: This tag is - not necessary for routing - senseless on ways - only useful on nodes (the last one, where no other way is connected) The wiki should be changed, especially the use on ways should be removed. But I do not agree to I doubt

Re: [Tagging] noexit

> Am 03/dic/2013 um 14:48 schrieb André Pirard : > > noexit=yes, apparently corresponding to this dead end signal, is said to be > used "at the end of a highway=* to indicate that there no possibility to > travel further by any transport mode this is a hint for the mapper to be put on dead

Re: [Tagging] noexit

On 12/3/2013 8:48 AM, André Pirard wrote: I doubt very much that this tags helps anybody or any quality-check program to understand anything. A note should suffice, and I think the best option would be to remove that confusing tag. It is a signal to quality checking programs such as KeepRight.

[Tagging] noexit

Hi, noexit =yes, apparently corresponding to this dead end signal, is said to be used "at the end of a highway =* to indicate that there no

Re: [Tagging] How to tag babycare?

+1 http://bigfatfrog67.me On 03/12/2013 10:56, Pieren wrote: So I would prefer "amenity=changing_table" as an isolated feature or "changing_table=yes" when attached to something else (like "amenity=toilets"). Something similar is proposed here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Toilets#Other_p

[Tagging] max{height, width}:physical was Re: How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

On 12/3/13 7:40 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > if you want to tag this on the barrier (node), it might also be an > option to use "maxwidth:physical". This is currently not among the > mostly used tags, but the similar maxheight:physical has some (few) > usage, and it indicates nicely that th

Re: [Tagging] How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

2013/12/3 Georg Feddern > If I would see a tag "width" (or est-width) at an object called "barrier", > I would assume > - in the first line: It is the width of the barrier object itself. > - on a second thought: It may be the total width of the opening left in > the barrier. > > But definitely no

Re: [Tagging] How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

Am 03.12.2013 um 10:44 schrieb Volker Schmidt : > Should I use "width" or "est_width" which normally indicates the width of a > way? Yes, you could tag the width to the portion of cycle way in the barrier. Cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Ta

Re: [Tagging] How to tag babycare?

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Satoshi IIDA wrote: > Considering a more detailed situation, like "Only female toilet has such a > equipment". > Maybe "female:diaper = [yes|no|room|table]"? > > In this case, I prefer to take "diaper = limited". > To avoid too much information. I found this in wi

Re: [Tagging] preproposal : internet webcam

On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Georg Feddern wrote: > If we want to extend the tagging, we should use a new but generic tag > (camera?) in my opinion. > Yes, this may result in parallel tagging - but we should not run in the next > cul-de-sac with one's eyes open. We already have some tags whic

Re: [Tagging] How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

I've pondered this without conclusion, yet. Unfortunately it's a bit complicated, since length and width of vehicle, width of barrier and width of path all come into play. You could probably calculate it for "standard" bikes by drawing a ?0.7m straight path through the barrier and then calculatin

Re: [Tagging] How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

Am 03.12.2013 10:44, schrieb Volker Schmidt: Here in Italy we have plenty of bicycle barriers or chicanes (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Barrier_examples), often with more than 2 inverted-U-shaped bars to make life even more difficult. [...] Should I use "width" or "est_width" which nor

[Tagging] How to tag max width at chicane-type bicycle barriers

Here in Italy we have plenty of bicycle barriers or chicanes ( https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Barrier_examples), often with more than 2 inverted-U-shaped bars to make life even more difficult. They are used to prevent motorcycles from using cycle paths (not as in Germany to prevent bicycles fr