Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

2013-12-15 Thread Pieren
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com wrote: The advantage of a proposal and discussion is that it improves documentation. +1 and that's already good enough no ? Although I did not myself check this proposal, the feedbacks seem to express a good idea but a lack of

Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

2013-12-15 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2013/12/15 Pee Wee piewi...@gmail.com 1. There are no absolute rules as to when it is approved/rejected (and I can understand that) there are for voting: we require at least 15 votes and a majority of yes votes. Of course a won voting doesn't make your tag approved or used by the

Re: [Tagging] End voting bicycle=use_cycleway

2013-12-15 Thread Pee Wee
1. There are no absolute rules as to when it is approved/rejected (and I can understand that) there are for voting: we require at least 15 votes and a majority of yes votes. Of course a won voting doesn't make your tag approved or used by the community. 2. For some reason it

Re: [Tagging] Topographic place names

2013-12-15 Thread bulwersator
It is usable only for maps generated for area similar to the one pictured, therefore it should be added at stage of processing data, not to the OSM database. It suffers from the same problem as lets place a single node. On Sat, 14 Dec 2013 08:16:39 -0800 Tobias Knerr