>
> John, at this point, would you please you put all this into a summary, or
> a full proposal, so we can see the entire package?
>
Do you mean this?:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/All_you_can_eat
I think I should better document the serving_system values. I will do that
thi
> So now, what's the difference in /serving style/ between rodizio and dim
sum?
The former is a serving style while the latter is a cuisine. The latter
might also appear in restaurants that employ a serving style of rodizio.
Btw, this is the first time I've been exposed to that term either in prin
Updated the proposal.
Summary of changes:
1. combined subtag :opening_hours with the main tag (inspired by the tags
lit and fee)
2. removed value "only" from main tag
3. added value "special" to main tag
4. renamed subtag :type to serving_system (should I move this to a new
proposal?)
2014-02-1
> So now, what's the difference in /serving style/ between rodizio and dim
> sum?
>
I never went to a restaurant with *dim sum*, but reading about it on
wikipedia, I would say the differences are:
In a rodízio, the waiters go around offering food, and don't leave food on
a table unless requested by
On 2/17/14 1:49 PM, Steve Doerr wrote:
> On 17/02/2014 18:04, Fernando Trebien wrote:
>
>> I still think that "opening_hours" as a subtag would be an unnecessary
>> specialization that would only be needed rarely. Can you provide an
>> example in which you would not be able to represent that inform
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 7:57 AM, John Packer wrote:
> Actually, all_you_can_eat:type=* describes the *way* the food is served.
> If the value is buffet, then people go to the food to get it; if the
> value is rodízio, then waiters go around the restaurant offering samples
> of food to each table;
On 17/02/2014 18:04, Fernando Trebien wrote:
I still think that "opening_hours" as a subtag would be an unnecessary
specialization that would only be needed rarely. Can you provide an
example in which you would not be able to represent that information
in a different way? (such as using two or m
I'm not sure I understood everything you said, John, specially about
"interval". Would you update your proposal and send it to us the way
you think it should be?
I suggested "serving system" because that's how Wikipedia describes
it. I think I know English well, but since I'm not a native speaker,
> Am 16/feb/2014 um 01:06 schrieb Dave Swarthout :
> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more than
> one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only that there is
> at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. Therefore the plural
> designation might
> Am 16/feb/2014 um 01:06 schrieb Dave Swarthout :
>
> I prefer singular because the plural term explicitly states that more than
> one unit is available to rent while the singular implies only that there is
> at least one unit for rent on a short term basis. Therefore the plural
> designatio
2014-02-17 12:58 GMT+00:00 nounours77 :
> Dear Clifford, dear Pierren,
>
> thanks for your thoughts. Here some answers
>
>
>> What/Who defines what is an Architectural Monument? When I think it is more
>> along the lines of what Wikipedia [1] defines as a monument.
>
> No, I'm not (specifically) ta
Dear Clifford, dear Pierren,
thanks for your thoughts. Here some answers
> What/Who defines what is an Architectural Monument? When I think it is more
> along the lines of what Wikipedia [1] defines as a monument.
No, I'm not (specifically) talking about specific monuments created for
commemor
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:31 PM, nounours77
> But most might be more interesting to architectural interested than to normal
> tourists.
Something like "architectural_interest=grade1" ..
"architectural_interest=grade5" ?
More seriously, is it not something very subjective ? is OSM the right
plac
13 matches
Mail list logo
