Re: [Tagging] cleanup broken import "fix"
Dan S wrote on Wed, 28 May 2014 21:57:46 +0100: >If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@ >about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits! I think you are right. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] cleanup broken import "fix"
If I understand right you should probably ask imports@ not tagging@ about making bulk edits, even if they're to fix bulk edits! Best Dan 2014-05-28 21:53 GMT+01:00 malenki : > Recently I found some 10.000 (one of two changesets contained 38k) > objects tagged like this:¹ > | gnis:fcode=39004 > | natural=water > | nhd:com_id=146082168 > | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 > | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 > | source=NHD > | water=lake;pond > > They were imported by nmixter and in v1 were tagged like this: > | ele=0.0 > | gnis:fcode=39004 > | gnis:ftype=LakePond > | natural=water > | nhd:com_id=146082168 > | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 > | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 > | source=NHD > > "WorstFixer" removed ele 0.0 and honoured his name by converting > gnis:ftype=LakePond to > water=lake;pond > > Has anyone objections for removing water=lake;pond and also the other > proprietary data? > I'd think > | natural=water > and > | source=NHD > (and in case it is there) > intermittent=yes > should be sufficient > > See also: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2237 > > Regards > Thomas > > ¹ example: https://www.osm.org/way/73966050/history > > ___ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
[Tagging] cleanup broken import "fix"
Recently I found some 10.000 (one of two changesets contained 38k) objects tagged like this:¹ | gnis:fcode=39004 | natural=water | nhd:com_id=146082168 | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 | source=NHD | water=lake;pond They were imported by nmixter and in v1 were tagged like this: | ele=0.0 | gnis:fcode=39004 | gnis:ftype=LakePond | natural=water | nhd:com_id=146082168 | nhd:fdate=Mon Mar 06 00:00:00 PST 2006 | nhd:reach_code=18030012024071 | source=NHD "WorstFixer" removed ele 0.0 and honoured his name by converting gnis:ftype=LakePond to water=lake;pond Has anyone objections for removing water=lake;pond and also the other proprietary data? I'd think | natural=water and | source=NHD (and in case it is there) intermittent=yes should be sufficient See also: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2237 Regards Thomas ¹ example: https://www.osm.org/way/73966050/history ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] editing polygons in JOSM
2014-05-27 20:23 GMT+02:00 Tom Gertin : > I want to try to complete several polygon editing operations using JOSM. > Anybody know if this is possible or how to accomplish these tasks in JOSM > or any other free editor? > > 1. Clip a polygon using another polygon > 2. Cut a polygon using a line > if you need to do a lot of these operations, maybe QGis is an option for you, it supports editing OSM and supports boolean operations on Polygons. cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Re: [Tagging] Urban perimeter
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > I see, for this you'd most probably need a new boundary type (if it isn't > the same as your administrative boundaries). +1 type=boundary + boundary=? Pieren ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
