> Il giorno 27/ago/2014, alle ore 01:37, "John F. Eldredge"
> ha scritto:
>
> It is a communication channel, but only one-way. The image seen by the
> camera is communicated to whomever is watching it at its destination, or
> whomever may watch the recorded image later.
Agreed, but the ta
On 08/26/2014 05:51 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Il giorno 26/ago/2014, alle ore 19:44, Andreas Neumann
ha scritto:
I don't understand, why a webcam is a communication channel.
I agree
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://
> Il giorno 26/ago/2014, alle ore 19:44, Andreas Neumann
> ha scritto:
>
> I don't understand, why a webcam is a communication channel.
I agree
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer
wrote:
> Thus the comparison with [amenity=school], that can be easily expanded to
> the
> whole campus, fails for [amenity=place_of_worship].
>
> To conclude, [amenity=place_of_worship] should not be expanded to the
> full campus, and [landuse=religi
Hi,
there exists a tagging for webcams in the contact-namespace
(contact:webcam=*)[http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:contact:webcam].
I don't understand, why a webcam is a communication channel.
Andreas
--
sorry for my bad english...
Andreas Neumann
http://map4Jena.de
http://Stadtplan-Ilm
I'm not sure that's the right mailing list for talking about this, but it's
probably the closest
Am I the only one that dislikes the "Map Features" templates on the wiki?
(example: [1])
I think they make it harder to edit the wiki.
People can find it hard to find out how to edit the template.
Als
Pieren wrote, on 2014-08-26 18:07:
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
Thus the comparison with [amenity=school], that can be easily expanded to
the
whole campus, fails for [amenity=place_of_worship].
[...]
I'm not following you here. Active or not doesn't change the fact tha
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Tom Pfeifer wrote:
> Thus the comparison with [amenity=school], that can be easily expanded to
> the
> whole campus, fails for [amenity=place_of_worship].
>
> Thus, an active church building should be tagged
> [amenity=place_of_worship]
> [building=church]
>
John Packer wrote, on 2014-08-26 16:57:
I'm not against landuse=religious, but I'm not satisfied with it's current
description:
The area surrounding a amenity=place_of_worship used for religious purposes
I believe a tag such as landuse=religious is inevitably going to be used as
indicatin
Hi,
How did this topic turn out in the end?
The wiki page Tag:landuse=religious [1] was translated to yet another
language (japanese), and this tag is getting more uses (most likely due to
being included as a preset in JOSM[2]), so I assume it's becoming de facto
I'm not against landuse=religiou
André I think you missed a major thing about cartography (and topography).
As OSM contributors, we're not cartographers but topographers... we record
topographic data.
Then cartographers use that data, make choices to have some objets of THEIR
choice visible on the map THEY are making with the da
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 8:36 PM, André Pirard
wrote:
> Yes, this sentence is misunderstood, and by many repliers apparently.
> It means that once Mapnik uses a (defined) rendering you cannot change it
> (RENDER is ignored).
> The main idea behind RENDER is not coloring objects, and I agree it
> s
12 matches
Mail list logo