Dear mapping and cycling friends
as that article is in German, it is questionable, if the international mailig
list is a good adress,
but in German language, I've found only local mailing lists.
As one can hear and read in discussions, and as is visible from the results of
mapping, a lot of
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the
German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized
we still don't have tagging schema for it.
After I failed to address the issues with leisure=gym in my last
proposal (ambiguity of the word gym) and
the problem with nodes is, that they are easily overssen.
It would be nice to have the possibility to show a warning when moving an
opject with high accuracy. The best examples are GPS reference points like
this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2977364293
Since they have fixed coordinates it
TP It was not clear if the OP indeed wants to map pipelines,
TP or was just quoting the pipeline expert for his opinion about
TP surveying methods.
the latter. I'm referring to all nodes, not just pipelines marker.
Just used the conversation I had some time ago as an example.
W Terms !!
W In
I never understood the cycleway=opposite. I would really need a picture of
a situation where you need it.
IMHO you do not have to use this tag on a oneway street where cyclists can
drive in both directions, but on their own side. So I think your
requirement to always add it to a oneway street
cycleway=opposite is useful for marking that cyclists may drive in both
direction, \
but there is no marked contraflow lane (for streets with contraflow lane
there is
cycleway=opposite_lane tag).
2014-12-25 20:36 GMT+01:00 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com:
I never understood the
I don't agree,
the definition says:
---
Use *cycleway*=opposite for situations where cyclists are permitted to
travel in both directions on a road which is one-way for normal traffic, in
situations where there is no dedicated contra-flow lane marked for
cyclists. In practice there is typically a
Does this table help you?
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Ulamm/Tables_of_street_layouts
As you can see, it suggests some innovative tags.
And it also suggests an alternative for opposite track.
best regards
Ulrich
Am 25.12.2014 um 20:45 schrieb tagging-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
It's the last case of Cars in one direction, cycling in both.
I don't see what the value of cycleway=opposite is, when there is
already a oneway:bicycle=no. Of course cyclists while drive in the
opposite direction then and on the right side of the street for them.
There is no cycleway so why
On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the
German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we
still don't have tagging schema for it.
Thanks for addressing this. Fitness
Matthijs Melissen wrote on 2014-12-25 22:35:
On 25 December 2014 at 14:21, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the
German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we
still don't have tagging schema
Now I've understood you, and I think I agree with you:
This cycleway=opposite is something like an abused tag, as in reality there
is no cycleway.
The problem is that no renderer understands oneway:bicycle=no, which would be
the correct tag.
I have mailed and phoned to the maintainers of two
On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 6:21 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote:
Just had the great idea to suggest tagging gyms/fintess centres for the
German a weekly task (new year's resolutions incoming), when I realized we
still don't have tagging schema for it.
After I failed to address the
First of all my compliments for seeking the opinions of the tagging mailing
list and your effort to improve OSM.
Here are my 2 cents
1 Why does OSM need to distinguish between obligatory and optional cycle
ways?
As a cyclist myself I can see some reasons why it could be useful for
routers
14 matches
Mail list logo
