But there's no (easy) way to define an address connected to an unnamed road.
Way numbers
are not supported for addr:street, afik.
most residential roads are totally unnamed in Japan. Most larger roads have a
number (and a name). motorways (outside Tokyo) have only names.
What we would
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:50 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net
wrote:
That scheme seems to rely on house number model. Sure looks good.
But does it, by implication, indicate there is a (eg) a house number 12
on the unnamed service road ? I'm not into mapping house numbers so
don't
On 16.04.2015 06:25, Dave Swarthout wrote:
But I'd be willing to bet that most trails are not part of a network of
other trails or a route but are stand-alone. The trails I once hiked in the
Adirondack Mountains in New York State all have names and trailheads but,
with a couple of exceptions,
On 17/04/2015 14:38, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
A more useful metric is how many different contributors used the tag.
Is anyone aware of any analysis of who (or how many users) first used
particular tags, or who (or how many users) accepted a tag by making a
subsequent change to an object?
On April 17, 2015 3:40:41 AM PDT, Craig Wallace craig...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On 2015-04-17 07:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
If you entered Pinnacles Campground Site 12 into your OSM powered
GPS,
would you not be happy if it took you all the way to Site 12?
Yes, but I don't think addr:housenumber
It will be hard to come up with a number to distinguish between the two. As
others have pointed out on this mailing list before, the actual number of
items that can be tagged with a certain tag matters.
So in case there are only 600 items in the whole world of that thing, it
is de-facto. If there
On 2015-04-17 07:39, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
If you entered Pinnacles Campground Site 12 into your OSM powered GPS,
would you not be happy if it took you all the way to Site 12?
In practice that would also require:
addr:housenumber=12
addr:street=[unnamed service road]
They are not
Please also see at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Extend_camp_site#Tagging_of_individual_pitches
Sorry that I can't comment on the area originally linked to but I am currently
in the mountains with only a mobile phone and a lousy connection so I am having
difficulty
On 15.04.2015 11:54, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
People put building=* on any structure
+1, and I am fine with it, just wanted to comment on not all tanks are
buildings and point out that in OSM all structures are buildings.
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
Maybe
Am 17.04.2015 um 17:40 schrieb Friedrich Volkmann b...@volki.at:
Bridges? Masts? Fences? Rails? Flagpoles? Power lines?
Maybe everything that looks like a building, smells like a building and
behaves like a building, but not all structures.
bridges yes, the others not, see here for a
FWIW, on a mountain where I volunteer I mapped the campgrounds with the tagging
shown on the proposed extensions page which uses ref=* instead of addr:street
or addr:unit.
I have also generated paper maps off that OSM data. Local fire people saw one
and were impressed and asked for a copy.
Folks, to revisit a topic that had lots of discussion last month !
I have updated the proposal page for camp_site=[basic; standard;
serviced; delux].
I now avoid the question of how to tag multiple instances of (eg)
amenity on the one node, area. People seem to have strong but
conflicting views
On Apr 14, 2015 2:10 AM, Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com wrote:
How would you tag:
Here are my reformulated answers.
Note that the answers do not apply to all countries, and most certainly
not to the US, where to my knowledge there are no distinctions between
bicycle and pedestrian use
13 matches
Mail list logo
