Re: [Tagging] Colour coding of wiki description boxes

2015-05-05 Thread Marc Gemis
No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority. pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to reply, not ? please do not try to draw such conclusions without hard numbers. it does not help your cause for mechanical edits. regards m.

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-05-05 Thread David Bannon
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:22 -0500, John F. Eldredge wrote: It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my experience of campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered poles marking each campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a charcoal grill mounted on a steel

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread David Bannon
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 09:44 +, Jerry Clough - OSM wrote: It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover camps organised for profit and by non-profits would be leisure=vacation_camp. I don't think 'vacation' or 'leisure' are good terms at all. A lot of people use the

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-05-05 Thread John F. Eldredge
It has been many years since I last went tent-camping, but my experience of campgrounds in the US national park system was numbered poles marking each campsite, a grassy area for pitching a tent, and a charcoal grill mounted on a steel pole. You weren't allowed to cut brush or to have a fire on

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-05-05 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, David Bannon dban...@internode.on.net wrote: I haven’t been in a RV/caravan only type campground There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent pages a problem, maybe operator/owner just wants self contained campers. I'd suggest for

Re: [Tagging] Tagging of pitches within a campsite

2015-05-05 Thread David Bannon
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:54 -0700, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: There are some like that, maybe a concrete or tarmac base so tent The amenity=caravan_site was indeed invented for what amounts to a parking lot for overnight use by RV's. Do you mean tourism=caravan_site (14K uses v. 1 use)?

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread pmailkeey .
I think we can nibble away at this for 'some time' not achieving much by going round in circles too much. Can we look at the camp problem on a wiki page where we can all chip in - by listing every different kind of camp we can think of and categorising each whether leisure, commercial, individual,

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 1:35 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to camp, any kind of camp will be organised. (medical camp, refugee camp, detention camp, summer camp, military camp, ...) Sure it adds information. At a

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-05 11:01 GMT+02:00 Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com: At a campground each camper is free to organize their time among their own group. At scout, military and summer camp there is a scheduled program campers are expected to participate in. OK, agree, but still it would be bad

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread John Willis
Do we really need to tag activity type? Religion, sports, or operator should take care of it. There's not a a lot of Buddhism practice at my school camp (any at all?), nor would I expect religion to be the activity - it is merely the operator or the thing in common. I bet the people at the

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-05-05 3:25 GMT+02:00 pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com: Too big a jump, I think. Bearing in mind it is under leisure, how about 'organised_camp' ? May want to hold that for something else. . . Such as ? organised_camp doesn't add any information compared to camp, any kind of

Re: [Tagging] Colour coding of wiki description boxes

2015-05-05 Thread Andy Mabbett
On 5 May 2015 at 13:35, Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com wrote: No, not everybody is against mechanical edits, not even a majority. pretty hard to tell when not all mappers were questioned or bothered to reply, not ? If people choose not to (or are not bothered to) comment, that's an

Re: [Tagging] Colour coding of wiki description boxes

2015-05-05 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 05/04/2015 01:07 PM, Matthijs Melissen wrote: The problem is that there is a very vocal minority against mechanical edits, and that minority is of the opinion that a majority cannot approve mechanical edits if there is a minority that disagrees. I think that if the majority of people

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread Jerry Clough - OSM
 It seems to me that the obvious generalisation, which would cover camps  organised for profit and by non-profits would be leisure=vacation_camp. This simply generalises summer, and avoids the very specific British connotations associated with  holiday_camp. This does not precisely cover things

Re: [Tagging] Camps

2015-05-05 Thread Bryce Nesbitt
The core question is: should this be a top level tag: leisure=camp_site leisure=communal_activity_camp leisure=caravan_site Or subtags: leisure=camp_site caravans=dedicated tents=yes communal_activity_camp=no sanitary_dump_station=no leisure=camp_site operator=Girl