Re: [Tagging] life ring or life preserver

2015-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 09.08.2015 um 09:03 schrieb Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de: http://talk-gb.openstreetmap.narkive.com/hXPJNpfG/life-ring-british-english British English: lifebelt American English: lifebuoy German English: lifering the oxford dictionaries pretend that

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (nutrition_supplements)

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
Brought this up a few months back. http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/shop-supplements-gt-shop-dietary-supplements-td5845622.html What I found is that dietary supplements was what wikiepdia used and also most common on government pages (e.g. Food and Drug Administration). The EU even just seem to

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
Isn't so addr: as well? I actually don't like the addr: either. Because in most editors it means I have to type addr:s to get autocomplete, while it just have to type ph to get phone. Especially on mobile with the : it's not that great. In addition we have so many tools and good editors

Re: [Tagging] life ring or life preserver

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
http://talk-gb.openstreetmap.narkive.com/hXPJNpfG/life-ring-british-english British English: lifebelt American English: lifebuoy German English: lifering __ openstreetmap.org/user/AndiG88 wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:AndiG88‎ ___

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone Am 09.08.2015 um 15:49 schrieb Richard ricoz@gmail.com: that is the exact point explaining why there is a need for contact:website. A website= is generally not a contact page but the homepage. Otoh contact:website= should contain a specific page for conatct, be

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Richard
On Fri, Aug 07, 2015 at 10:23:44AM +0200, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Am 07.08.2015 um 00:38 schrieb Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com: For some tag developments i can see the benefits, but I'm struggling with this one I'm afraid. +1 while in the

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread John Willis
On Aug 10, 2015, at 12:56 AM, Andreas Goss andi...@t-online.de wrote: Overall I only see that this in some way might be usefull for phone and email. But I think it's better to assume phone= is used for some basic contact number and then use other tags like phone:emergency= or

Re: [Tagging] Contact:* prefix

2015-08-09 Thread Andreas Goss
while in the addr:-namespace all keys are actually address components, this can be contested for the contact: namespace. A website for instance is not primarily a means of contact, sometimes it might not be suitable at all for contact purposes, but still there are generally good reasons to add